Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27106810›Full record

ReviewHigh blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension2016

Gender Differences in Antihypertensive Treatment: Myths or Legends?

Maria Lorenza Muiesan, Massimo Salvetti, Claudia Agabiti Rosei, Anna Paini

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Person's Care Requires a Sex and Gender Approach.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria Lorenza MuiesanClinica Medica, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Internal Medicine c/o 2ª Medicina, Spedali Civili, 25100, Brescia, Italy. marialorenza.muiesan@unibs.it.
Massimo SalvettiClinica Medica, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Internal Medicine c/o 2ª Medicina, Spedali Civili, 25100, Brescia, Italy.
Claudia Agabiti RoseiClinica Medica, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Internal Medicine c/o 2ª Medicina, Spedali Civili, 25100, Brescia, Italy.
Anna PainiClinica Medica, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Internal Medicine c/o 2ª Medicina, Spedali Civili, 25100, Brescia, Italy.
University of Brescia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In European countries and in the USA, hypertension represents an important risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in men and women. Women do not perceive CVD as an important health problem, despite the evidence that women are more at risk to die from hypertension-related CVD than men. A correct prevention strategy should more widely acknowledge sex-specific risk factors, such as hypertension in pregnancy, and the benefit of treating hypertension in both men and women. In more recent years, hypertension awareness and treatment rates are higher in women than in men while blood pressure control rates are improving, but remain still lower in older hypertensive women. Differences have been described regarding the pattern of antihypertensive drug prescription and use in hypertensive men and women; women are more frequently treated with diuretics and less frequently with angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors and angiotensin-receptors blockers. Calcium-antagonists appear to be particularly effective in women. Data from large clinical trials and meta-analyses offer strong evidence that the efficacy of the various drug classes in prevention of CV events does not differ by sex, and therefore the choice of the drug cannot be based only on this criterion in post- menopausal women. There are currently no specific blood pressure (BP) treatment goals for post-menopausal hypertension.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth Status DisparitiesAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansHypertensionMalePostmenopausePractice Guidelines as TopicPrevalenceRisk FactorsSex FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive AgentsBlood pressureGenderHypertensionsexTreatmentWomen

Identifiers

PMID27106810
OpenAlexW2339842137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.