Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27106696›Full record

ArticleFolia microbiologica2016

An immunological assay for identification of potential biofilm-associated antigens of Staphylococcus aureus.

Charlene Babra Waryah, Jully Gogoi-Tiwari, Kelsi Wells, Trilochan Mukkur

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Folia microbiologica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Charlene Babra WaryahSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Bentley, Perth, 6102, Western Australia, Australia.
Jully Gogoi-TiwariSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Bentley, Perth, 6102, Western Australia, Australia.
Kelsi WellsSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Bentley, Perth, 6102, Western Australia, Australia.
Trilochan MukkurSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Bentley, Perth, 6102, Western Australia, Australia. tk_mukkur@hotmail.com.
Curtin University · AUAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attachment of bacterial pathogens to the niche tissue in the host is the first step in biofilm formation leading to colonization and establishment of infection in the host. While the most common method used for determining the potential role of a bacterial antigen in biofilm formation has been demonstration of loss of this property using specific knockout mutants, it is an expensive and a laborious procedure. This study describes an alternative immunological assay for identification of attachment antigens of Staphylococcus aureus, potentially important in the development of an effective vaccine against infections caused by this pathogen. The method is based upon the concept of inhibition of attachment of S. aureus to PEGs coated with virulence antigen-specific antibodies. Antibodies used for validation of this assay were specific for ClfA, FnBPA, SdrD, PNAG and α-toxin, accredited biofilm-associated antigens of S. aureus.

Indexed as

Adhesins, BacterialAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialBacterial AdhesionBiofilmsImmunoassayPolystyrenesStaphylococcus aureusAdhesins, BacterialAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialPolystyrenes

Identifiers

PMID27106696
OpenAlexW2337565106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.