Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27106691›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2016

The median effective concentration (EC50) of propofol with different doses of fentanyl during colonoscopy in elderly patients.

Shiyang Li, Fang Yu, Huichen Zhu, Yuting Yang, Liqun Yang, Jianfeng Lian

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. PropofolWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shiyang LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Quanzhou Children's Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fujian, 362000, China.
Fang YuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200136, China.
Huichen ZhuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200136, China.
Yuting YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200136, China.
Liqun YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200136, China. lqyang72721@163.com.
Jianfeng LianDepartment of Anesthesiology, Quanzhou Children's Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fujian, 362000, China.
Renji Hospital · CNFujian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPropofol and fentanyl are the most widely administered anesthesia maintaining drugs during colonoscopy. In this study, we determined the median effective concentration (EC50) of propofol required for colonoscopy in elderly patients, and the purpose of this study was to describe the pharmacodynamic interaction between fentanyl and propofol when used in combination for colonoscopy in elderly patients.

methodsNinety elderly patients scheduled for colonoscopy were allocated into three groups in a randomized, double-blinded manner as below, F0.5 group (0.5 μg.kg(-1) fentanyl), F1.0 group (1.0 μg.kg(-1) fentanyl) and saline control group. Anaesthesia was achieved by target-controlled infusion of propofol (Marsh model, with an initial plasma concentration of 2.0 μg.ml(-1)) and fentanyl. Colonoscopy was started 3 min after the injection of fentanyl. The EC50 of propofol for colonoscopy with different doses of fentanyl was measured by using an up-and-down sequential method with an adjacent concentration gradient at 0.5 μg.ml(-1) to inhibit purposeful movements. Anaesthesia associated adverse events and recovery characters were also recorded.

resultsThe EC50 of propofol for colonoscopy in elderly patients were 2.75 μg.ml(-1) (95% CI, 2.50-3.02 μg.ml(-1)) in F0.5 group, 2.05 μg.ml(-1) (95% CI, 1.98-2.13 μg.ml(-1)) in F1.0 group and 3.08 μg.ml(-1) (95% CI, 2.78-3.42 μg.ml(-1)) in control group respectively (P < 0.05). Patients in the F1.0 group had a significantly longer awake time and length of hospital stay than those in control group (P < 0.05).

conclusionIncreasing doses of fentanyl up to 1.0 μg.kg(-1) reduces the propofol EC50 required for elderly patients undergoing colonoscopy, and there was no significant difference in anaesthesia associated adverse events but prolonged awake and discharge time.

trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR15006368. Date of registration: May 3, 2015.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnesthetics, IntravenousColonoscopyDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFentanylHumansMalePainPropofolAnesthetics, IntravenousFentanylPropofolEC50Elderly patientsFentanylPropofol

Identifiers

PMID27106691
PMCPMC4840854
OpenAlexW2337207680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.