Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27106609›Full record

ArticleWomen's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health

Factors Shaping Women's Pre-abortion Communication with Their Regular Gynecologic Care Providers.

Julie Chor, Megan Tusken, Phoebe Lyman, Melissa Gilliam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julie ChorDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; The MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: jchormd@gmail.com.
Megan TuskenThe Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Phoebe LymanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Melissa GilliamDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

Funding

Re-Engineering Translational Research at the University of ChicagoKL2TR000431 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SOLWAY, JULIAN · 2012 to 2016
$2.1M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo understand women's experiences communicating with their regular gynecologic care provider about abortion decision making before obtaining an abortion at a dedicated abortion clinic. STUDY

designSemistructured interviews were conducted with women presenting for first-trimester surgical abortion at a high-volume, hospital-based abortion clinic. Women were asked whether and why they did or did not discuss their abortion decision with their gynecologic care provider. Interviews were transcribed and computer-assisted content analysis was performed; salient themes are presented.

resultsThirty women who obtained an abortion were interviewed. A majority of the 24 women who had a regular gynecologic care provider did not discuss their decision with that provider. Themes associated with not discussing their decision included: 1) perceiving that the discussion would not be beneficial, 2) expecting that gynecologic care providers do not perform abortions, 3) anticipating or experiencing logistical barriers, and 4) worrying about disrupting the patient-provider relationship. Women who did discuss their decision primarily did so because the pregnancy was diagnosed at the time of a previously scheduled appointment and generally did not believe that their provider performed abortions.

conclusionFor many women, seeking counsel from a regular gynecologic provider before seeking an abortion may not afford a significant benefit. However, some women express concerns with regard to seeking abortion counselling from their regular provider. These concerns underscore the need for gynecologic providers to foster patient-provider relationships that allow women to feel comfortable discussing all aspects of their reproductive health.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedCommunicationFamily Planning ServicesPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultDecision MakingFemaleGynecologyHumansInterviews as TopicPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID27106609
PMCPMC4958534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.