Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27106577›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2016

Predictors of biospecimen donation in the Black Women's Health Study.

Lucile L Adams-Campbell, Chiranjeev Dash, Julie R Palmer, Manuela V Wiedemeier, Cordelia W Russell, Lynn Rosenberg, Yvette C Cozier

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lucile L Adams-CampbellGeorgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, 3970 Reservoir Road, N.W., E501, Washington, DC, 20057, USA. lla9@georgetown.edu.
Chiranjeev DashGeorgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, 3970 Reservoir Road, N.W., E501, Washington, DC, 20057, USA.
Julie R PalmerSlone Epidemiology Center, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Manuela V WiedemeierSlone Epidemiology Center, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Cordelia W RussellSlone Epidemiology Center, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Lynn RosenbergSlone Epidemiology Center, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Yvette C CozierSlone Epidemiology Center, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Boston University · USGeorgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer CenterGeorgetown University Medical Center · US

Funding

FOLLOW-UP STUDY FOR CAUSES OF ILLNESS IN BLACK WOMENR01CA058420 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI ROSENBERG, LYNN · 1999 to 2013
$20.7M
A Follow-up Study for Causes of Cancer in Black WomenUM1CA164974 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI ROSENBERG, LYNN · 2012 to 2017
$13.7M
Gene Polymorphisms in Relation to Cancer in Black WomenR01CA098663 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI PALMER, JULIE R · 2003 to 2012
$5.3M
Uncoupling obesity from breast cancer in African American womenU01CA182898 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI DENIS, GERALD V, PALMER, JULIE R · 2013 to 2017
$3.1M
Molecular Epidemiology of Oxidative Stress and Related Cancers in Black WomenK07CA197112 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI DASH, CHIRANJEEV · 2016 to 2020
$655k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA197112NCI NIH HHS R01 CA058420NCI NIH HHS R01 CA098663NCI NIH HHS U01 CA182898NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA164974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough African-Americans experience higher cancer morbidity and mortality rates compared to their White counterparts, their participation in biospecimen research is lower than that of their white peers. This study investigated the prevalence and predictors of biospecimen donation in a large, cohort study of Black women.

methodsThe BWHS is a follow-up study of U.S. Black women aged 21-69 years enrolled through postal health questionnaires. Between January 2004 and December 2007, participants were sent a consent form with a postage-paid return envelope, and a mouthwash collection kit. Univariate and age- and educational status-adjusted logistic regression models were used to estimate the association of socio-demographic, lifestyle and medical factors with donation of biospecimens.

resultsBuccal cells with consent forms were obtained from 26,790 women, for a response rate of 51 %. The strongest predictors of biospecimen donation were age: response increased from 48.6 % among those aged <40 to 63.1 % among those aged 60 and older [RR 1.30 (95 % CI 1.27, 1.34)]; multivitamin use [RR (95 % CI) 1.32 (1.30, 1.34)]; physician visit in the previous 2 years [RR (95 % CI) 1.61 (1.58, 1.65)], and a history of breast [RR (95 % CI) 1.59 (1.56, 1.63)], colon [RR (95 % CI) 1.18 (1.16, 1.20)], and cervical [RR (95 % CI) 1.63 (1.60, 1.67)] cancer screening.

conclusionsWe found that 51 % of women in the geographically-dispersed Black Women's Health Study cohort were willing to provide mouthwash samples to be used for genetic analyses. The response in this study is encouraging given published findings of low overall participation rates of African-Americans in genetic studies.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorPatient SelectionAdultAgedAge FactorsBiological Specimen BanksBlack or African AmericanBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesColonic NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedVitaminsBiospecimensBlacksBuccal cellsDNAGeneticsWomen

Identifiers

PMID27106577
PMCPMC5089698
OpenAlexW2338332508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.