ArticleExperimental eye research2016
Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy reveals quenching of fluorescein within corneal epithelium.
Article in Experimental eye research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Thermally activated delayed fluorescence photocatalysts: a kinetic model to predict time-resolved spectroscopic experiments and photoreactions under continuous irradiation.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Investigation of Parameters Influencing Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy in Frequency- and Time-Domain Illustrated by Phasor Plot Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy: fundamentals and advances in instrumentation, analysis, and applications.Journal of biomedical optics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Topical application of fluorescein results in background fluorescence of normal corneal epithelial cells. The fluorescence appears relatively weak and is often ignored clinically. The concentrations of fluorescein applied clinically exceed the threshold for self quenching. The possibility that exuberant topical concentrations of fluorescein result in quenching of fluorescence in tears and normal corneal epithelium is explored. Fluorescence lifetime measurements are sensitive to quenching and are less vulnerable to inner filter effect than steady state measurements. The types of fluorescence lifetime quenching often report informative molecular interactions. Therefore, fluorescence lifetime confocal imaging was performed in solutions, tears and corneal epithelium removed by membrane cytology following applied fluorescein. Amplitude averaged fluorescence lifetimes (τamp) were measured with time resolved single photon counting using a pulsed diode laser for excitation of fluorescein. Lifetime decays were fit to multi-exponential models with least squares analysis. Stern-Volmer plots for both intensity (I) and (τamp) were determined. Stern-Volmer plots demonstrated both dynamic and static quenching components (R(2) = 0.98 exponential fit, I0/I). Plots of τamp versus concentration of fluorescein revealed a linear relationship. Immediately after fluorescein application, quenching was evident in tears (τamp < 1 ns) versus tears sampled after 5 min (τamp = 3.7 ns). Corneal epithelium showed quenching (τamp ≤ 2 ns) from 1 to 16 min post fluorescein instillation. Clinical concentrations of fluorescein show self-quenching but rapidly dilute as tears turnover. Intracellular quenching occurs in normal corneal epithelium. Lifetime decay curves suggest complex mechanisms are involved. Quenching is a plausible explanation for the low fluorescence background observed clinically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.