Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27105849›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2016

Do nucleic acids moonlight as molecular chaperones?

Brianne E Docter, Scott Horowitz, Michael J Gray, Ursula Jakob, James C A Bardwell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. G-quadruplexes rescuing protein folding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Quantitative reconstitution of yeast RNA processing bodies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brianne E DocterCellular and Molecular Biology Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6508-6015
Scott HorowitzDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Michael J GrayDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Ursula JakobDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
James C A BardwellCellular and Molecular Biology Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA jbardwel@umich.edu.
University of Michigan · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AT MICHIGANT32GM007315 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PUTHENVEEDU, MANOJKUMAR A · 1985 to 2021
$12.8M
Functional Analysis of the Intrinsically Disordered Chaperone Hsp33R01GM065318 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI JAKOB, URSULA H. · 2003 to 2015
$3.9M
Mechanism of an Acid Activated ChaperoneR01GM102829 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BARDWELL, JAMES, JAKOB, URSULA H. · 2013 to 2016
$1.8M
Polyphosphate - A Novel Member of the Proteostasis NetworkR01GM116582 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI JAKOB, URSULA H. · 2015 to 2016
$913k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM065318NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102829NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM116582NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organisms use molecular chaperones to combat the unfolding and aggregation of proteins. While protein chaperones have been widely studied, here we demonstrate that DNA and RNA exhibit potent chaperone activity in vitro Nucleic acids suppress the aggregation of classic chaperone substrates up to 300-fold more effectively than the protein chaperone GroEL. Additionally, RNA cooperates with the DnaK chaperone system to refold purified luciferase. Our findings reveal a possible new role for nucleic acids within the cell: that nucleic acids directly participate in maintaining proteostasis by preventing protein aggregation.

Indexed as

Protein RefoldingChaperonin 60DNAMolecular ChaperonesProtein AggregatesProtein DenaturationRNAChaperonin 60DNAMolecular ChaperonesProtein AggregatesRNA

Identifiers

PMID27105849
PMCPMC4889950
OpenAlexW2341242641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.