Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27105845›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2016

Companion: a web server for annotation and analysis of parasite genomes.

Sascha Steinbiss, Fatima Silva-Franco, Brian Brunk, Bernardo Foth, Christiane Hertz-Fowler, Matthew Berriman, Thomas D Otto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed
28.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genome sequence of aMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Nuclear Genome Assembly and Annotation of Kinetoplastids.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genome assembly ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Comparative Genomics of the First ResistantJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  19. Competitive fungal commensalism mitigates candidiasis pathology.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2024
    Article
  20. Draft genome ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sascha SteinbissParasite Genomics, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK ss34@sanger.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2151-0574
Fatima Silva-FrancoInstitute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK.
Brian BrunkDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Bernardo FothParasite Genomics, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
Christiane Hertz-FowlerInstitute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK.
Matthew BerrimanParasite Genomics, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
Thomas D OttoParasite Genomics, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
Wellcome Sanger Institute · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Wellcome Trust WT098051Wellcome Trust WT099198MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently available sequencing technologies enable quick and economical sequencing of many new eukaryotic parasite (apicomplexan or kinetoplastid) species or strains. Compared to SNP calling approaches, de novo assembly of these genomes enables researchers to additionally determine insertion, deletion and recombination events as well as to detect complex sequence diversity, such as that seen in variable multigene families. However, there currently are no automated eukaryotic annotation pipelines offering the required range of results to facilitate such analyses. A suitable pipeline needs to perform evidence-supported gene finding as well as functional annotation and pseudogene detection up to the generation of output ready to be submitted to a public database. Moreover, no current tool includes quick yet informative comparative analyses and a first pass visualization of both annotation and analysis results. To overcome those needs we have developed the Companion web server (http://companion.sanger.ac.uk) providing parasite genome annotation as a service using a reference-based approach. We demonstrate the use and performance of Companion by annotating two Leishmania and Plasmodium genomes as typical parasite cases and evaluate the results compared to manually annotated references.

Indexed as

Genome, ProtozoanSoftwareDatabases, GeneticGene OntologyInternetLeishmaniaMolecular Sequence AnnotationPhylogenyPlasmodium falciparumProtozoan ProteinsRNA, ProtozoanSensitivity and SpecificityProtozoan ProteinsRNA, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID27105845
PMCPMC4987884
OpenAlexW2338978258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.