ArticleZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2017
Multi-centre evaluation of accuracy and reproducibility of planar and SPECT image quantification: An IAEA phantom study.
Article in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- EANM practice guideline for quantitative SPECT-CT.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Guideline
- Quantitative SPECT/CT: Technique and Clinical Applications.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026Review
- On the use of solidEJNMMI physics · 2023Article
- A Review on the Use of Imaging Biomarkers in Oncology Clinical Trials: Quality Assurance Strategies for Technical Validation.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Review
- The QuADRANT study: current status and recommendations for improving uptake and implementation of clinical audit of medical radiological procedures in Europe-the nuclear medicine perspective.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Article
- An International Study of Factors Affecting Variability of Dosimetry Calculations, Part 1: Design and Early Results of the SNMMI Dosimetry Challenge.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2021Article
- Recommendations for Multicentre Clinical Trials Involving Dosimetry for Molecular Radiotherapy.Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)) · 2021Article
- Clinical implementation of PLANET® Dose for dosimetric assessment after [EJNMMI research · 2021Article
- Setting up a quantitative SPECT imaging network for a European multi-centre dosimetry study of radioiodine treatment for thyroid cancer as part of the MEDIRAD project.EJNMMI physics · 2020Article
- Implementation of patient dosimetry in the clinical practice after targeted radiotherapy using [EJNMMI research · 2018Article
- Inter-comparison of quantitative imaging of lutetium-177 (EJNMMI physics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate quantitation of activity provides the basis for internal dosimetry of targeted radionuclide therapies. This study investigated quantitative imaging capabilities at sites with a variety of experience and equipment and assessed levels of errors in activity quantitation in Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) and planar imaging. Participants from 9 countries took part in a comparison in which planar, SPECT and SPECT with X ray computed tomography (SPECT-CT) imaging were used to quantify activities of four epoxy-filled cylinders containing
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.