ArticleBMJ open2016
Protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis: hop (Humulus lupulus L.) for menopausal vasomotor symptoms.
Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- The association between age of menopause and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Nutrition & metabolism · 2024Article
- Association between body mass index in the first half of pregnancy and gestational diabetes: A systematic review.SAGE open medicine · 2022Review
- Effect of gestational diabetes mellitus on lipid profile: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2022Article
- A Systematic Review on Use of Medicinal Plants for Male Infertility Treatment.Journal of family & reproductive health · 2021Review
- Facemask and Respirator in Reducing the Spread of Respiratory Viruses; a Systematic Review.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2021Review
- Investigation of the role of herbal medicine, acupressure, and acupuncture in the menopausal symptoms: An evidence-based systematic review study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020Review
- The association between diabetes and age at the onset of menopause: a systematic review protocol.Systematic reviews · 2019Article
- Effects of date palm pollen on fertility: research proposal for a systematic review.BMC research notes · 2017Article
- Hypoglycemic effects of Acacia nilotica in type II diabetes: a research proposal.BMC research notes · 2017Article
- Sleep disorder, an independent risk associated with arterial stiffness in menopause.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Pregnancy Outcome of Abnormal Nuchal Translucency: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2017Article
- Nanomedicine Approaches for Treatment of Menopausal Symptoms.Journal of menopausal medicine · 2016Article
- Hops for Menopausal Vasomotor Symptoms: Mechanisms of Action.Journal of menopausal medicine · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMenopause is a critical stage in every woman's life. It can cause a distressing time for women by creating various vasomotor symptoms (VMS). Phytoestrogens can potentially exert various favourable effects and alleviate VMS in postmenopausal women. The hop (Humulus lupulus L.) contains 8-prenylnaringenin (8-PN), the most potent phytoestrogen known to date. The hop is eight times stronger than any other herbal oestrogens. This study aims to conduct a comprehensive systematic review and a meta-analysis survey of the effects of hop in the management of VMS in postmenopausal women.
methodsOnly randomised controlled clinical trials, with cluster randomisation and crossover, blinded and non-blinded designs, conducted between 2000 and 2015, will be included in this review. Quasi-experimental and observational studies as well as case reports will be excluded. The studies will be selected if their participants were aged 40-60 years, had elevated follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels and/or menstrual irregularities, and experienced discomforting VMS (at least hot flashes or night sweats). The primary outcome will be the rate of response to treatment, such as changes in frequency and intensity of symptoms in the intervention and placebo groups. 'Hop', 'Humulus', 'menopause', 'vasomotor', 'hot flashes', 'phytoestrogen' and 'night sweats' will be used as search key words. Prior to their inclusion in the review, the selected papers will be assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity. Any disagreements will be resolved through a third reviewer. The risk of bias will be independently determined using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The quality of the papers will be assessed based on the CONSORT checklist. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Results will be disseminated through traditional academic literature. Dissemination of results will occur by peer-reviewed publications. The results of our project can help reproductive health researchers when evaluating the discomforts of research procedures described in study protocols or when designing a study. Information on experiences of menopausal women involved in previous studies may also help in future research. The expected dissemination actions are effective treatment in designing strategies that aim to develop women's health and healthcare providers when offering treatment for women with vasomotor symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.