Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27105645›Full record

SynthesisOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2016

Zolpidem use and risk of fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

S M Park, J Ryu, D R Lee, D Shin, J M Yun, J Lee

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Zolpidem: Efficacy and Side Effects for Insomnia.Health psychology research · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. The importance of the circadian system & sleep for bone health.Metabolism: clinical and experimental · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S M ParkDepartment of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 103, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, 03080, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J RyuDepartment of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 103, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, 03080, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
D R LeeDepartment of Family Medicine, Wonkwang University Sanbon Hospital, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, 321, Sanbon-ro, Gunpo-si, 15865, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea. rednose7695@gmail.com.
D ShinDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101, Daihak-ro, Jongno-gu, 03080, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J M YunDepartment of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 103, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, 03080, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J LeeDepartment of Family Medicine, Wonkwang University Sanbon Hospital, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, 321, Sanbon-ro, Gunpo-si, 15865, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Seoul National University Hospital · KRWonkwang University · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledZolpidem is a representative of non-benzodiazepine hypnotics. Recent epidemiologic studies have reported increased fracture risk in patients taking zolpidem, but the results have been inconsistent. The present meta-analysis shows that the use of zolpidem is associated with an increased risk of fractures. PURPOSE: Previous studies have reported inconsistent findings regarding the association between the use of zolpidem and the risk of fractures. We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to assess the association.

methodsWe identified relevant studies by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO without language restrictions (until August 2014). Methodological quality was assessed based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).

resultsA total of 1,092,925 participants (129,148 fracture cases) were included from 9 studies (4 cohort, 4 case-control, and 1 case-crossover study). Overall, the use of zolpidem was associated with an increased risk of fracture (relative risk [RR] 1.92, 95 % CI 1.65-2.24; I (2) = 50.9 %). High-quality subgroups (cohort studies, high NOS score, adjusted for any confounder, or adjusted for osteoporosis) had higher RRs than the corresponding low-quality subgroups (high quality, 1.94-2.76; low quality, 1.55-1.79). Of note, the risk for hip fracture was higher than that for fracture at any site (hip fracture, RR 2.80, 95 % CI 2.19-3.58; fracture at any site, RR 1.84, 95 % CI 1.67-2.03; P < 0.001).

conclusionsThe use of zolpidem may increase the risk of fractures. Clinicians should be cautious when prescribing zolpidem for patients at high risk of fracture.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneHumansPyridinesRiskZolpidemPyridinesZolpidemFractureHypnoticsMeta-analysisNon-benzodiazepineZolpidem

Identifiers

PMID27105645
OpenAlexW2340516901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.