ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2016
Evaluation of potential immunogenicity differences between Pandemrix™ and Arepanrix™.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01161160 (An Observer-blind Safety and Immunogenicity Study of GSK Biologicals' A/California/7/2009), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Observer-blind Safety and Immunogenicity Study of GSK Biologicals' A/California/7/2009 (H1N1)V-like Vaccines GSK2340274A and GSK2340272A in Children 3 to Less Than 10 Years Old
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The immunopathogenesis of narcolepsy type 1.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2024Review
- The adjuvant BcfA activates antigen presenting cells through TLR4 and supports TFrontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Development of a Novel Assay to Assess the Avidity of Dengue Virus-Specific Antibodies Elicited in Response to a Tetravalent Dengue Vaccine.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Narcolepsy and H1N1 influenza immunology a decade later: What have we learned?Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Antibody avidity, persistence, and response to antigen recall: comparison of vaccine adjuvants.NPJ vaccines · 2021Article
- Recombinant protein vaccines, a proven approach against coronavirus pandemics.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2021Review
- Physiology of gangliosides and the role of antiganglioside antibodies in human diseases.Cellular & molecular immunology · 2020Review
- Autoimmunity in narcolepsy.Current opinion in pulmonary medicine · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In retrospective observational studies, an increased relative risk of incident narcolepsy was observed in some European countries among recipients of the AS03-adjuvanted, A(H1N1)pdm09, inactivated, detergent-split virion vaccine Pandemrix™ manufactured in Dresden, Germany (D-Pan H1N1). A similar increased risk was not observed in a retrospective population-based study in individuals in Quebec province, Canada, who received Aprepanrix™, a Quebec-manufactured AS03-adjuvanted A(H1N1)pdm09 inactivated, detergent-split virion vaccine (Q-Pan H1N1). Antibody responses in D-Pan versus Q-Pan vaccinees (adults/children) measured as hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers 21 d post-vaccination were found to be equivalent (NCT01161160). The current post-hoc analysis was conducted to determine whether antibody avidity differed following immunization with the 2 vaccines. Using surface plasmon resonance, we evaluated the capacity of serum specimens (drawn from the comparative immunogenicity trial) from a subset of subjects aged 3-9 y who received either D-Pan or Q-Pan (N = 28/group), to bind to recombinant A(H1N1)pdm09 hemagglutinin. IgG antibodies were purified from Day 21 sera. Binding was assessed by end association level; dissociation by retention of antigen-antibody complexes at the end of the dissociation phase, and kd. Inter-run variability for the control monoclonal antibody, association levels and dissociation levels was low (CVs 1.3%, 7.8% and 1.4%, respectively); non-specific binding was negligible. High avidity and slow dissociation was observed for both groups (kd ≤ 10(-4)/s; geometric mean [IQR] association and dissociation levels for D-Pan/Q-Pan: 15.4 RU [13.4-17.7]/12.4 RU [10.8-14.3] and 94.5% [92.5-96.5]/95.5% [93.5-97.6], respectively). Association, but not dissociation levels correlated with HI titers. No significant differences in avidity parameters were observed between D-Pan and Q-Pan sera.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.