Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27105134›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of circumpolar health2016

What do we know about health-related knowledge translation in the Circumpolar North? Results from a scoping review.

M Ellen McDonald, Andrew Papadopoulos, Victoria L Edge, James Ford, IHACC Research Team, Alison Sumner, Sherilee L Harper

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of circumpolar health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Disseminating the Results of a Depression Management Study in an Urban Alaska Native Health Care System.American Indian and Alaska native mental health research (Online) · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M Ellen McDonaldDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada; harpers@uoguelph.caellenmcdonald09@gmail.com.
Andrew PapadopoulosDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Victoria L EdgeDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
James FordDepartment of Geography, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
IHACC Research Team
Alison SumnerDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Sherilee L HarperDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada; harpers@uoguelph.caellenmcdonald09@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth research knowledge translation (KT) is important to improve population health outcomes. Considering social, geographical and cultural contexts, KT in Inuit communities often requires different methods than those commonly used in non-Inuit populations.

objectivesTo examine the extent, range and nature of literature about health-related KT in Inuit communities.

designA scoping review was conducted. A search string was used to search 2 English aggregator databases, ProQuest and EBSCOhost, on 12 March 2015. Study selection was conducted by 2 independent reviewers using inclusion and exclusion criteria. To be included, studies had to explicitly state that KT approaches were used to share human health research results in Inuit communities in the Circumpolar North. Articles that evaluated or assessed KT approaches were thematically analysed to identify and characterize elements that contributed to KT success or challenges.

resultsFrom 680 unique records identified in the initial search, 39 met the inclusion criteria and were retained for analysis. Of these 39 articles, 17 evaluated the KT approach used; thematic analysis identified 3 themes within these 17 articles: the value of community stakeholders as active members in the research process; the importance of local context in tailoring KT strategies and messaging; and the challenges with varying and contradictory health messaging in KT. A crosscutting gap in the literature, however, included a lack of critical assessment of community involvement in research. The review also identified a gap in assessments of KT in the literature. Research primarily focused on whether KT methods reflected the local culture and needs of the community. Assessments rarely focused on whether KT had successfully elicited its intended action.

conclusionsThis review synthesized a small but burgeoning area of research. Community engagement was important for successful KT; however, more discussion and discourse on the tensions, challenges and opportunities for improvement are necessary.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeOutcome Assessment, Health CareTranslational Research, BiomedicalArctic RegionsFemaleHumansInformation DisseminationMaleCircumpolar NorthdisseminationhealthInuitknowledge exchangeknowledge transferknowledge translationpublic health messagingresults sharingscoping review

Identifiers

PMID27105134
PMCPMC4841210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.