Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27104951›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Empiric Piperacillin-Tazobactam versus Carbapenems in the Treatment of Bacteraemia Due to Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Tat Ming Ng, Wendy X Khong, Patrick N A Harris, Partha P De, Angela Chow, Paul A Tambyah, David C Lye

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Effect of incremental tazobactam concentrations on the bactericidal activity of piperacillin against ESBL-producing enterobacterales clinical isolates causing bacteraemia.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Controversies in the management of ESBL-producing Enterabacterales. Clinical Implications.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Tat Ming NgDepartment of Pharmacy, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-4570-3266
Wendy X KhongDepartment of Pharmacy, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Patrick N A HarrisDivision of Infectious Diseases, University Medicine Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Partha P DeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Angela ChowDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Institute of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Paul A TambyahDepartment of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
David C LyeYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Tan Tock Seng Hospital · SGNational University of Singapore · SGNanyang Technological University · SGThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae are a common cause of bacteraemia in endemic countries and may be associated with high mortality; carbapenems are considered the drug of choice. Limited data suggest piperacillin-tazobactam could be equally effective. We aimed to compare 30-day mortality of patients treated empirically with piperacillin-tazobactam versus a carbapenem in a multi-centre retrospective cohort study in Singapore. Only patients with active empiric monotherapy with piperacillin-tazobactam or a carbapenem were included. A propensity score for empiric carbapenem therapy was derived and an adjusted multivariate analysis of mortality was conducted. A total of 394 patients had ESBL-Escherichia.coli and ESBL-Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia of which 23.1% were community acquired cases. One hundred and fifty-one received initial active monotherapy comprising piperacillin-tazobactam (n = 94) or a carbapenem (n = 57). Patients who received carbapenems were less likely to have health-care associated risk factors and have an unknown source of bacteraemia, but were more likely to have a urinary source. Thirty-day mortality was comparable between those who received empiric piperacillin-tazobactam and a carbapenem (29 [30.9%] vs. 17 [29.8%]), P = 0.89). Those who received empiric piperacillin-tazobactam had a lower 30-day acquisition of multi-drug resistant and fungal infections (7 [7.4%] vs. 14 [24.6%]), P<0.01). After adjusting for confounders, use of empiric piperacillin-tazobactam was not associated with increased 30-day mortality (OR 1.00, 95% CI; 0.45-2.17). Empiric piperacillin-tazobactam was not associated with increased 30-day mortality and may result in fewer multi-drug resistant and fungal infections when compared with a carbapenem.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiabeta-Lactamase Inhibitorsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsEnterobacteriaceaeFemaleHumansMalePenicillanic AcidPiperacillinPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug CombinationRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-Lactamase Inhibitorsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsPenicillanic AcidPiperacillinPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination

Identifiers

PMID27104951
PMCPMC4841518
OpenAlexW2342144563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.