Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27104911›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2016

Medical Team Evaluation: Effect on Emergency Department Waiting Time and Length of Stay.

Juliane Lauks, Blaz Mramor, Klaus Baumgartl, Heinrich Maier, Christian H Nickel, Roland Bingisser

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05230108 (Implementation of Advanced Triage in the Emergency Department of Bellvitge University Hospital), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05230108 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Implementation of Advanced Triage in the Emergency Department of Bellvitge University Hospital

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Universitari de BellvitgeRan2022 to 2025Enrolled547ConditionsNurse's Scope of PracticeArmsAdvanced Triage
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Team triage increases discharges and decreases time to discharge without increasing test ordering.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Juliane LauksDepartment of Information and Communications Technology, University of Basel Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Blaz MramorFreiburg Institute of Advanced Studies, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Klaus BaumgartlDepartment of Information and Communications Technology, University of Basel Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Heinrich MaierDepartment of Information and Communications Technology, University of Basel Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Christian H NickelEmergency Department, University of Basel Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Roland BingisserEmergency Department, University of Basel Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emergency Departments (ED) are trying to alleviate crowding using various interventions. We assessed the effect of an alternative model of care, the Medical Team Evaluation (MTE) concept, encompassing team triage, quick registration, redesign of triage rooms and electronic medical records (EMR) on door-to-doctor (waiting) time and ED length of stay (LOS). We conducted an observational, before-and-after study at an urban academic tertiary care centre. On July 17th 2014, MTE was initiated from 9:00 a.m. to 10 p.m., 7 days a week. A registered triage nurse was teamed with an additional senior ED physician. Data of the 5-month pre-MTE and the 5-month MTE period were analysed. A matched comparison of waiting times and ED LOS of discharged and admitted patients pertaining to various Emergency Severity Index (ESI) triage categories was performed based on propensity scores. With MTE, the median waiting times improved from 41.2 (24.8-66.6) to 10.2 (5.7-18.1) minutes (min; P < 0.01). Though being beneficial for all strata, the improvement was somewhat greater for discharged, than for admitted patients. With a reduction from 54.3 (34.2-84.7) to 10.5 (5.9-18.4) min (P < 0.01), in terms of waiting times, MTE was most advantageous for ESI4 patients. The overall median ED LOS increased for about 15 min (P < 0.01), increasing from 3.4 (2.1-5.3) to 3.7 (2.3-5.6) hours. A significant increase was observed for all the strata, except for ESI5 patients. Their median ED LOS dropped by 73% from 1.2 (0.8-1.8) to 0.3 (0.2-0.5) hours (P < 0.01). In the same period the total orders for diagnostic radiology increased by 1,178 (11%) from 10,924 to 12,102 orders, with more imaging tests being ordered for ESI 2, 3 and 4 patients. Despite improved waiting times a decrease of ED LOS was only seen in ESI level 5 patients, whereas in all the other strata ED LOS increased. We speculate that this was brought about by the tendency of triage physicians to order more diagnostic radiology, anticipating that it may be better for the downstream physician to have more information rather than less.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionAdultAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelCritical IllnessCrowdingEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospitalizationHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient Care TeamPatient DischargeRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID27104911
PMCPMC4841508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.