Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27104553›Full record

ReviewViruses2016

Translational Control during Calicivirus Infection.

Elizabeth Royall, Nicolas Locker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Translational Control in Virus-Infected Cells.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elizabeth RoyallFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Biosciences and Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7HX, UK. e.royall@surrey.ac.uk.
Nicolas LockerFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Biosciences and Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7HX, UK. n.locker@surrey.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N000943/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, we provide an overview of the strategies developed by caliciviruses to subvert or regulate the host protein synthesis machinery to their advantage. As intracellular obligate parasites, viruses strictly depend on the host cell resources to produce viral proteins. Thus, many viruses have developed strategies that regulate the function of the host protein synthesis machinery, often leading to preferential translation of viral mRNAs. Caliciviruses lack a 5' cap structure but instead have a virus-encoded VPg protein covalently linked to the 5' end of their mRNAs. Furthermore, they encode 2-4 open reading frames within their genomic and subgenomic RNAs. Therefore, they use alternative mechanisms for translation whereby VPg interacts with eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs) to act as a proteinaceous cap-substitute, and some structural proteins are produced by reinitiation of translation events. This review discusses our understanding of these key mechanisms during caliciviruses infection as well as recent insights into the global regulation of eIF4E activity.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationProtein BiosynthesisAnimalsCaliciviridaeCaliciviridae InfectionsEukaryotic Initiation Factor-4EGene Expression Regulation, ViralGenome, ViralHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansProtein BindingViral ProteinsEukaryotic Initiation Factor-4EViral ProteinscalicivirusreinitiationVPg

Identifiers

PMID27104553
PMCPMC4848598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.