Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27104476›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2016

Acoustic trauma slows AMPA receptor-mediated EPSCs in the auditory brainstem, reducing GluA4 subunit expression as a mechanism to rescue binaural function.

Nadia Pilati, Deborah M Linley, Haresh Selvaskandan, Osvaldo Uchitel, Matthias H Hennig, Cornelia Kopp-Scheinpflug, Ian D Forsythe

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Enhances CaThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Auditory brainstem development and plasticity.Current opinion in physiology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Activity-Dependent Calcium Signaling in Neurons of the Medial Superior Olive during Late Postnatal Development.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Physiological models of the lateral superior olive.PLoS computational biology · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Nadia PilatiAutifony Srl Laboratories, Medicines Research Centre, 37135, Verona, Italy.
Deborah M LinleyDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology & Behaviour, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 9HN, UK.
Haresh SelvaskandanDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology & Behaviour, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 9HN, UK.
Osvaldo UchitelInstituto de Fisiología y Biología Molecular y Neurociencias, Universidad de Buenos Aires-CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Ciudad Universitaria, C1428-Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Matthias H HennigInstitute for Adaptive and Neural Computation, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AB, UK.
Cornelia Kopp-ScheinpflugMRC Toxicology Unit, Hodgkin Bldg, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 9HN, UK.
Ian D ForsytheMRC Toxicology Unit, Hodgkin Bldg, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 9HN, UK.
University of Leicester · GBFundación Ciencias Exactas y Naturales · ARLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0900425Medical Research Council MR/K005170/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key pointsLateral superior olive (LSO) principal neurons receive AMPA receptor (AMPAR) - and NMDA receptor (NMDAR)-mediated EPSCs and glycinergic IPSCs. Both EPSCs and IPSCs have slow kinetics in prehearing animals, which during developmental maturation accelerate to sub-millisecond decay time-constants. This correlates with a change in glutamate and glycine receptor subunit composition quantified via mRNA levels. The NMDAR-EPSCs accelerate over development to achieve decay time-constants of 2.5 ms. This is the fastest NMDAR-mediated EPSC reported. Acoustic trauma (AT, loud sounds) slow AMPAR-EPSC decay times, increasing GluA1 and decreasing GluA4 mRNA. Modelling of interaural intensity difference suggests that the increased EPSC duration after AT shifts interaural level difference to the right and compensates for hearing loss. Two months after AT the EPSC decay times recovered to control values. Synaptic transmission in the LSO matures by postnatal day 20, with EPSCs and IPSCs having fast kinetics. AT changes the AMPAR subunits expressed and slows the EPSC time-course at synapses in the central auditory system. ABSTRACT: Damaging levels of sound (acoustic trauma, AT) diminish peripheral synapses, but what is the impact on the central auditory pathway? Developmental maturation of synaptic function and hearing were characterized in the mouse lateral superior olive (LSO) from postnatal day 7 (P7) to P96 using voltage-clamp and auditory brainstem responses. IPSCs and EPSCs show rapid acceleration during development, so that decay kinetics converge to similar sub-millisecond time-constants (τ, 0.87 ± 0.11 and 0.77 ± 0.08 ms, respectively) in adult mice. This correlated with LSO mRNA levels for glycinergic and glutamatergic ionotropic receptor subunits, confirming a switch from Glyα2 to Glyα1 for IPSCs and increased expression of GluA3 and GluA4 subunits for EPSCs. The NMDA receptor (NMDAR)-EPSC decay τ accelerated from >40 ms in prehearing animals to 2.6 ± 0.4 ms in adults, as GluN2C expression increased. In vivo induction of AT at around P20 disrupted IPSC and EPSC integration in the LSO, so that 1 week later the AMPA receptor (AMPAR)-EPSC decay was slowed and mRNA for GluA1 increased while GluA4 decreased. In contrast, GlyR IPSC and NMDAR-EPSC decay times were unchanged. Computational modelling confirmed that matched IPSC and EPSC kinetics are required to generate mature interaural level difference functions, and that longer-lasting EPSCs compensate to maintain binaural function with raised auditory thresholds after AT. We conclude that LSO excitatory and inhibitory synaptic drive matures to identical time-courses, that AT changes synaptic AMPARs by expression of subunits with slow kinetics (which recover over 2 months) and that loud sounds reversibly modify excitatory synapses in the brain, changing synaptic function for several weeks after exposure.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsBrain StemEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsFemaleInhibitory Postsynaptic PotentialsMaleMice, Inbred CBAProtein SubunitsReceptors, AMPAProtein SubunitsReceptors, AMPA

Identifiers

PMID27104476
PMCPMC4929335
OpenAlexW2337166008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.