Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27103921›Full record

ReviewJournal of geriatric cardiology : JGC2016

Assessment and impact of diastolic function by echocardiography in elderly patients.

Clementina Dugo, Marzia Rigolli, Andrea Rossi, Gillian A Whalley

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Multiorgan, Multimodality Imaging in Cardiometabolic Disease.Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Clementina DugoAwhina Health Campus, Waitemata District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand; Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Italy.
Marzia RigolliAwhina Health Campus, Waitemata District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand; Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Italy.
Andrea RossiSection of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Italy.
Gillian A WhalleyAwhina Health Campus, Waitemata District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand; Institute of Diagnostic Ultrasound, Australasian Sonographers Association, Melbourne, Australia.
University of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Doppler echocardiography is the gold standard for assessment of diastolic dysfunction, which is increasingly recognised as a cause of heart failure, especially in the elderly. Using a combination of Doppler echocardiography techniques, it is possible to identify grades of diastolic dysfunction, estimate left ventricular filling pressures and establish the chronicity of diastolic dysfunction. These physiologically-derived measures have been widely validated against invasive measurements of left heart pressures and have been shown to be prognostically valuable in a wide range of clinical settings. This review explores the mechanisms, and approaches to the assessment of diastolic dysfunction in the elderly. The challenge for clinicians is to identify pathophysiological changes from those associated with normal ageing. When used in combination, and taking age into account, Doppler echocardiographic parameters are helpful in the assessment of dyspnoea in older patients and provide prognostic insights.

Indexed as

Diastolic dysfunctionDopplerEchocardiography

Identifiers

PMID27103921
PMCPMC4826896
OpenAlexW2327257216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.