Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27103253›Full record

Observational studyJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2017

Consistency of cardiac function index and global ejection fraction with global end-diastolic volume in patients with femoral central venous access for transpulmonary thermodilution: a prospective observational study.

Analena Beitz, Helena Berbara, Sebastian Mair, Benedikt Henschel, Tobias Lahmer, Sebastian Rasch, Roland Schmid, Wolfgang Huber

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Analena BeitzII. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Street 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Helena BerbaraII. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Street 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Sebastian MairII. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Street 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Benedikt HenschelII. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Street 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Tobias LahmerII. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Street 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Sebastian RaschII. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Street 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Roland SchmidII. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Street 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Wolfgang HuberII. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Street 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. Wolfgang.Huber@lrz.tum.de.
Nuklearmedizinische Klinik des Klinikums rechts der Isar · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global ejection fraction (GEF) and cardiac function index (CFI) are transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD)-derived indices of the systolic function. Their validity relies on an accurate determination of the global end-diastolic volume (GEDV). Due to an overestimation of GEDV using a femoral central venous catheter (CVC) a correction formula for indexed GEDV (GEDVI) has been implemented in the latest PiCCO™-algorithm. However, a recent study demonstrated that correction for femoral CVC does not pertain to pulmonary vascular permeability index PVPI, which is calculated of extravascular lung water EVLW and GEDV. Therefore, it was the aim of our study to evaluate, if GEF and CFI are corrected for femoral CVC. In ten adult ICU-patients with PiCCO™-monitoring, ten triplicate TPTDs were performed within 30 h. 95 complete data sets were analyzed, if a GEDV corrected for CVC site was applied to derive CFI and GEF. Therefore, we compared displayed values CFI

Indexed as

Stroke VolumeAlgorithmsBlood Flow VelocityCatheterization, Central VenousDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFemaleFemoral VeinHumansMaleMiddle AgedPulmonary ArteryPulmonary CirculationReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityThermodilutionVentricular Dysfunction, LeftCardiac function indexFemoral centralvenous catheterGlobal ejection fractionHemodynamic monitoringShockTranspulmonary thermodilution

Identifiers

PMID27103253
OpenAlexW2337786031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.