ArticleNanoscale2016
DNA sequence-dependent ionic currents in ultra-small solid-state nanopores.
Article in Nanoscale, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Understanding the Impact of Individual Nucleotide on Oxford Nanopore Current Signals With Interpretable Prediction Models.Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2025Article
- Polymer Translocation and Nanopore Sequencing: A Review of Advances and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Ionic current magnetic fields in 3D finite-length nanopores and nanoslits.European physical journal plus · 2022Article
- Overlimiting current near a nanochannel a new insight using molecular dynamics simulations.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Large-Scale Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Cellular Compartments.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
- Solid-state nanopores towards single-molecule DNA sequencing.Journal of human genetics · 2020Review
- Single-Stranded DNA Translocation Recordings through Solid-State Nanopores on Glass Chips at 10 MHz Measurement Bandwidth.ACS nano · 2019Article
- Rapid and Accurate Determination of Nanopore Ionic Current Using a Steric Exclusion Model.ACS sensors · 2019Article
- Colloquium: Ionic phenomena in nanoscale pores through 2D materials.Reviews of modern physics · 2019Article
- Conic shapes have higher sensitivity than cylindrical ones in nanopore DNA sequencing.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Chasing a Protein's Tail: Detection of Polypeptide Translocation through Nanopores.Biophysical journal · 2018Article
- tRNA Modification Detection Using Graphene Nanopores: A Simulation Study.Biomolecules · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Measurements of ionic currents through nanopores partially blocked by DNA have emerged as a powerful method for characterization of the DNA nucleotide sequence. Although the effect of the nucleotide sequence on the nanopore blockade current has been experimentally demonstrated, prediction and interpretation of such measurements remain a formidable challenge. Using atomic resolution computational approaches, here we show how the sequence, molecular conformation, and pore geometry affect the blockade ionic current in model solid-state nanopores. We demonstrate that the blockade current from a DNA molecule is determined by the chemical identities and conformations of at least three consecutive nucleotides. We find the blockade currents produced by the nucleotide triplets to vary considerably with their nucleotide sequences despite having nearly identical molecular conformations. Encouragingly, we find blockade current differences as large as 25% for single-base substitutions in ultra small (1.6 nm × 1.1 nm cross section; 2 nm length) solid-state nanopores. Despite the complex dependence of the blockade current on the sequence and conformation of the DNA triplets, we find that, under many conditions, the number of thymine bases is positively correlated with the current, whereas the number of purine bases and the presence of both purines and pyrimidines in the triplet are negatively correlated with the current. Based on these observations, we construct a simple theoretical model that relates the ion current to the base content of a solid-state nanopore. Furthermore, we show that compact conformations of DNA in narrow pores provide the greatest signal-to-noise ratio for single base detection, whereas reduction of the nanopore length increases the ionic current noise. Thus, the sequence dependence of the nanopore blockade current can be theoretically rationalized, although the predictions will likely need to be customized for each nanopore type.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.