Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27103233›Full record

ArticleNanoscale2016

DNA sequence-dependent ionic currents in ultra-small solid-state nanopores.

Jeffrey Comer, Aleksei Aksimentiev

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanoscale, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Large-Scale Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Cellular Compartments.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey ComerDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, Kansas State University, P-213 Mosier Hall, 1800 Denison Ave, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.
Aleksei AksimentievDepartment of Physics, University of Illinois, 1110 W Green St, Urbana, IL, USA. aksiment@illinois.edu.
Kansas State University · USUrbana University · US

Funding

Nanopore sequencing of DNA with MspAR01HG005115 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GUNDLACH, JENS, LASZLO, ANDREW · 2009 to 2024
$14.0M
Plasmonic nanopores for trapping, controlled motion and sequencing of DNAR01HG007406 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI AKSIMENTIEV, ALEKSEI · 2013 to 2016
$2.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG005115NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG007406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measurements of ionic currents through nanopores partially blocked by DNA have emerged as a powerful method for characterization of the DNA nucleotide sequence. Although the effect of the nucleotide sequence on the nanopore blockade current has been experimentally demonstrated, prediction and interpretation of such measurements remain a formidable challenge. Using atomic resolution computational approaches, here we show how the sequence, molecular conformation, and pore geometry affect the blockade ionic current in model solid-state nanopores. We demonstrate that the blockade current from a DNA molecule is determined by the chemical identities and conformations of at least three consecutive nucleotides. We find the blockade currents produced by the nucleotide triplets to vary considerably with their nucleotide sequences despite having nearly identical molecular conformations. Encouragingly, we find blockade current differences as large as 25% for single-base substitutions in ultra small (1.6 nm × 1.1 nm cross section; 2 nm length) solid-state nanopores. Despite the complex dependence of the blockade current on the sequence and conformation of the DNA triplets, we find that, under many conditions, the number of thymine bases is positively correlated with the current, whereas the number of purine bases and the presence of both purines and pyrimidines in the triplet are negatively correlated with the current. Based on these observations, we construct a simple theoretical model that relates the ion current to the base content of a solid-state nanopore. Furthermore, we show that compact conformations of DNA in narrow pores provide the greatest signal-to-noise ratio for single base detection, whereas reduction of the nanopore length increases the ionic current noise. Thus, the sequence dependence of the nanopore blockade current can be theoretically rationalized, although the predictions will likely need to be customized for each nanopore type.

Indexed as

NanoporesDNAIon TransportNucleotidesDNANucleotides

Identifiers

PMID27103233
PMCPMC4860951
OpenAlexW2321193502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.