Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27103025›Full record

Trial reportJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2016

18F-FDG PET-Derived Tumor Blood Flow Changes After 1 Cycle of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Predicts Outcome in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Olivier Humbert, Jean-Marc Riedinger, Jean-Marc Vrigneaud, Salim Kanoun, Inna Dygai-Cochet, Alina Berriolo-Riedinger, Michel Toubeau, Edouard Depardon, Maud Lassere, Simon Tisserand and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The impact of PET imaging on triple negative breast cancer: an updated evidence-based perspective.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Joint EANM-SNMMI guideline on the role of 2-[European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Guideline
  3. Prognostic value ofBreast cancer research : BCR · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Principles of Tracer Kinetic Analysis in Oncology, Part II: Examples and Future Directions.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Royal Society open science · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Getting the Most out of 18F-FDG PET Scans: The Predictive Value of 18F-FDG PET-Derived Blood Flow Estimates for Breast Cancer.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Olivier HumbertDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France ohumbert@cgfl.fr.
Jean-Marc RiedingerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Jean-Marc VrigneaudDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Salim KanounDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Inna Dygai-CochetDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Alina Berriolo-RiedingerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Michel ToubeauDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Edouard DepardonDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Maud LassereDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Simon TisserandDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Pierre FumoleauDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France.
François BrunotteDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Alexandre CochetDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Centre Georges François Leclerc · FRScience et Médecine (France) · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité de Bourgogne · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon Bourgogne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that early changes in blood flow (BF) in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and evaluated with

methodsForty-six consecutive women with triple-negative breast cancer and an indication for neoadjuvant chemotherapy were prospectively included. Women benefited from a baseline

resultsMedian baseline tumor BF was 21 mL/min/100 g (range, 6-46 mL/min/100 g) and did not significantly differ according to tumor size, Scarf-Bloom-Richardson grade, or Ki-67 expression. Median tumor ∆BF was -30%, with highly scattered values (range, -93% to +118%). A weak correlation was observed between ΔBF and ∆SUV

conclusionThis study suggests the clinical usefulness of an early user- and patient-friendly 2-min dynamic acquisition to monitor breast tumor ΔBF to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAngiographyAntineoplastic AgentsBlood Flow VelocityChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeovascularization, PathologicOutcome Assessment, Health CarePositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsAntineoplastic AgentsFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticalsblood flowbreast cancerperfusionPETtriple-negative

Identifiers

PMID27103025
OpenAlexW2335914738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.