Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27102637›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2016

Isolation and genotyping of Acanthamoeba strains (T4, T9, and T11) from amoebic keratitis patients in Iran.

Elham Hajialilo, Massoud Behnia, Fatemeh Tarighi, Maryam Niyyati, Mostafa Rezaeian

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Assessment ofJournal of water and health · 2024
    Article
  7. Morphological Characterization and Genotyping ofThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. In Vitro Cytopathogenic Activities ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Detection and Identification ofJournal of clinical microbiology · 2021
    Article
  13. Genotyping and phylogenic study ofParasite epidemiology and control · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Genotyping ofThe Indian journal of medical research · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elham HajialiloDepartment of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Public health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Massoud BehniaDepartment of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Public health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh TarighiDepartment of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Public health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Maryam NiyyatiDepartment of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. maryamniyati@yahoo.com.
Mostafa RezaeianDepartment of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Public health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. rezaiian@sina.tums.ac.ir.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The continuous increase in Acanthamoeba keratitis, a severe corneal infection, worldwide is mainly due to the increase in the number of soft contact lens users. In the present study, which involves a 5-year study, a total of 138 corneal scraps and contact lenses together with their paraphernalias were obtained from suspected amoebic keratitis patients. All samples were cultured using culture-enrichment method. Pathogenic assay, using thermotolerance and osmotolerance tests were also performed on the positive strains. Sequencing of the isolated strains was done by targeting the DF3 region of 18s rRNA gene. The results revealed that 18 (13 %) of patients were infected with Acanthamoeba spp. As expected, T4 genotype was the most common genotype among the clinical samples; however, in three cases, Acanthamoeba belonging to T11 and T9 were detected. Interestingly, T9 genotype, commonly classified as non-pathogenic amoebae, was identified as a causal agent of a patient with amoebic keratitis. From the pathogenic assay, four strains belonging to T4 genotypes were highly pathogenic. This is the first report of Acanthamoeba T9 genotypes isolated in Iran and the first report of T9 type occurring in amoebic keratitis patients worldwide. Due to the increasing trend of amoebic keratitis (AK) and the identification of new genotypes, such as T9 as the causative agent of AK, more researches in this field are necessary in the region and the world at large.

Indexed as

AcanthamoebaAcanthamoeba KeratitisAdolescentAdultBase SequenceBiological AssayContact LensesCorneaDNA, ProtozoanFemaleGenotypeHumansIranMaleSequence Analysis, DNAYoung AdultDNA, ProtozoanAcanthamoebaGenotypesIranKeratitis

Identifiers

PMID27102637
OpenAlexW2341892383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.