Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27102499›Full record

Trial reportHaematologica2016

Ruxolitinib versus best available therapy in patients with polycythemia vera: 80-week follow-up from the RESPONSE trial.

Srdan Verstovsek, Alessandro M Vannucchi, Martin Griesshammer, Tamas Masszi, Simon Durrant, Francesco Passamonti, Claire N Harrison, Fabrizio Pane, Pierre Zachee, Keita Kirito and 14 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Haematologica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Srdan VerstovsekThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA sverstov@mdanderson.org.
Alessandro M VannucchiCenter for Research and Innovation of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, AOU Careggi, University of Florence, Italy.
Martin GriesshammerJohannes Wesling Clinic, Minden, Germany.
Tamas MassziSt. István and St. László Hospital, Semmelweis University 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
Simon DurrantRoyal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Francesco PassamontiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Claire N HarrisonGuy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Fabrizio PaneUniversity of Naples Federico II, Italy.
Pierre ZacheeZNA Stuivenberg, Antwerp, Belgium.
Keita KiritoDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, University of Yamanshi, Chuo-shi, Japan.
Carlos BessesHematology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Masayuki HinoDepartment of Clinical Hematology and Diagnostics, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Beatriz MoiraghiHospital Jose Maria Ramos Mejia, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Carole B MillerSaint Agnes Cancer Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mario CazzolaDepartment of Hematology, University of Pavia, Italy.
Vittorio RostiCenter for the Study of Myelofibrosis, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Igor BlauMedical Department, Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Ruben MesaDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Mark M JonesIncyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Huiling ZhenIncyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Jingjin LiNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Nathalie FrancillardNovartis Pharma S.A.S, Rueil Malmaison, France.
Dany HabrNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Jean-Jacques KiladjianCentre d'Investigations Cliniques (INSERM CIC 1427), Hôpital Saint-Louis and Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RESPONSE is an open-label phase 3 study evaluating the Janus kinase 1/Janus kinase 2 inhibitor ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for efficacy/safety in hydroxyurea-resistant or intolerant patients with polycythemia vera. This preplanned analysis occurred when all patients completed the Week 80 visit or discontinued. Objectives included evaluating the durability of the primary response (Week 32 phlebotomy-independent hematocrit control plus ≥35% spleen volume reduction), its components, and that of complete hematologic remission; and long-term safety. Median exposure was 111 weeks; 91/110 (82.7%) patients randomized to ruxolitinib remained on treatment. No patients continued best available therapy (98/112 [87.5%] crossed over to ruxolitinib, most at/soon after Week 32). At Week 32, primary response was achieved by 22.7% vs. 0.9% of patients randomized to ruxolitinib and best available therapy, respectively (hematocrit control, 60.0% vs. 18.8%; spleen response, 40.0% vs. 0.9%). The probability of maintaining primary and hematocrit responses for ≥80 weeks was 92% and 89%, respectively; 43/44 spleen responses were maintained until Week 80. Complete hematologic remission at Week 32 was achieved in 23.6% of ruxolitinib-randomized patients; the probability of maintaining complete hematologic remission for ≥80 weeks was 69%. Among ruxolitinib crossover patients, 79.2% were not phlebotomized, and 18.8% achieved a ≥35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume after 32 weeks of treatment. New or worsening hematologic laboratory abnormalities in ruxolitinib-treated patients were primarily grade 1/2 decreases in hemoglobin, lymphocytes, and platelets. The thromboembolic event rate per 100 patient-years was 1.8 with randomized ruxolitinib treatment vs. 8.2 with best available therapy. These data support ruxolitinib as an effective long-term treatment option for hydroxyurea-resistant or intolerant patients with polycythemia vera. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 01243944.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAllelesCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene FrequencyHematocritHumansJanus KinasesMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Targeted TherapyMutationNitrilesPolycythemia VeraJanus KinasesNitrilesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrazolesPyrimidinesruxolitinib

Identifiers

PMID27102499
PMCPMC5004461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.