Trial reportHaematologica2016
Ruxolitinib versus best available therapy in patients with polycythemia vera: 80-week follow-up from the RESPONSE trial.
Trial report in Haematologica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
90 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Ruxolitinib for the prevention of thrombosis in polycythemia vera: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Blood advances · 2020Pooled it
- Long-term efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib versus best available therapy in polycythaemia vera (RESPONSE): 5-year follow up of a phase 3 study.The Lancet. Haematology · 2020Trial
- Thromboembolic events in polycythemia vera.Annals of hematology · 2019Trial
- Ruxolitinib for the treatment of inadequately controlled polycythemia vera without splenomegaly: 80-week follow-up from the RESPONSE-2 trial.Annals of hematology · 2018Trial
- Ruxolitinib is effective and safe in Japanese patients with hydroxyurea-resistant or hydroxyurea-intolerant polycythemia vera with splenomegaly.International journal of hematology · 2018Trial
- Ruxolitinib reduces JAK2 p.V617F allele burden in patients with polycythemia vera enrolled in the RESPONSE study.Annals of hematology · 2017Trial
- Polycythemia Vera, Thrombophilia, CTEPH, Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis and Vertebral Artery Occlusion: A Case-Illustrated Narrative Review of Competing Thrombotic and Hemorrhagic Risks.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prospective, non-interventional study of ruxolitinib therapy in patients with polycythaemia vera - German real-world data (PaVe study).Annals of hematology · 2026Observational
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of ropeginterferon alfa-2b for the management of patients with polycythemia vera in Japan.International journal of hematology · 2026Article
- Ruxolitinib treatment in patients with polycythemia vera reducesTherapeutic advances in hematology · 2026Article
- Disease Burden, Inadequate Hematocrit Control, and Thromboembolic Events in Patients with Polycythemia Vera Despite Current Standard of Care Treatment: A Retrospective Claims Study.Journal of blood medicine · 2026Article
- Tofacitinib Use in a Patient With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Polycythemia Vera: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Melanoma during Ruxolitinib Treatment for Myelofibrosis.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2025Article
- Pulmonary Coccidioidomycosis in a Ruxolitinib-Treated Polycythemia Vera Patient: A Case Study and Literature Review.Cureus · 2025Article
- Review
- Prevalence, incidence, and thromboembolic events in polycythemia vera: a study based on longitudinal German health claims data.Annals of hematology · 2025Observational
- Skin complications during iron chelation therapy for beta-thalassemia: overview and treatment approach.International journal of hematology · 2024Review
- Impact of Phlebotomy on Quality of Life in Low-Risk Polycythemia Vera.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Skin Malignancies Due to Anti-Cancer Therapies.Cancers · 2024Review
30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RESPONSE is an open-label phase 3 study evaluating the Janus kinase 1/Janus kinase 2 inhibitor ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for efficacy/safety in hydroxyurea-resistant or intolerant patients with polycythemia vera. This preplanned analysis occurred when all patients completed the Week 80 visit or discontinued. Objectives included evaluating the durability of the primary response (Week 32 phlebotomy-independent hematocrit control plus ≥35% spleen volume reduction), its components, and that of complete hematologic remission; and long-term safety. Median exposure was 111 weeks; 91/110 (82.7%) patients randomized to ruxolitinib remained on treatment. No patients continued best available therapy (98/112 [87.5%] crossed over to ruxolitinib, most at/soon after Week 32). At Week 32, primary response was achieved by 22.7% vs. 0.9% of patients randomized to ruxolitinib and best available therapy, respectively (hematocrit control, 60.0% vs. 18.8%; spleen response, 40.0% vs. 0.9%). The probability of maintaining primary and hematocrit responses for ≥80 weeks was 92% and 89%, respectively; 43/44 spleen responses were maintained until Week 80. Complete hematologic remission at Week 32 was achieved in 23.6% of ruxolitinib-randomized patients; the probability of maintaining complete hematologic remission for ≥80 weeks was 69%. Among ruxolitinib crossover patients, 79.2% were not phlebotomized, and 18.8% achieved a ≥35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume after 32 weeks of treatment. New or worsening hematologic laboratory abnormalities in ruxolitinib-treated patients were primarily grade 1/2 decreases in hemoglobin, lymphocytes, and platelets. The thromboembolic event rate per 100 patient-years was 1.8 with randomized ruxolitinib treatment vs. 8.2 with best available therapy. These data support ruxolitinib as an effective long-term treatment option for hydroxyurea-resistant or intolerant patients with polycythemia vera. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 01243944.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.