Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27102443›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Anti-miR delivery strategies to bypass the blood-brain barrier in glioblastoma therapy.

Dong Geon Kim, Kang Ho Kim, Yun Jee Seo, Heekyoung Yang, Eric G Marcusson, Eunju Son, Kyoungmin Lee, Jason K Sa, Hye Won Lee, Do-Hyun Nam

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Local Drug Delivery Strategies for Glioblastoma Treatment.Brain tumor research and treatment · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Molecular chaperones in the brain endothelial barrier: neurotoxicity or neuroprotection?FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. MicroRNA based theranostics for brain cancer: basic principles.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2019
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dong Geon KimDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
Kang Ho KimInstitute for Refractory Cancer Research, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Yun Jee SeoInstitute for Refractory Cancer Research, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Heekyoung YangInstitute for Refractory Cancer Research, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Eric G MarcussonProvidence Therapeutics, Calgary, Canada.
Eunju SonInstitute for Refractory Cancer Research, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Kyoungmin LeeDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
Jason K SaDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
Hye Won LeeDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
Do-Hyun NamDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
Samsung Medical Center · KRSungkyunkwan University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small non-coding RNAs called miRNAs are key regulators in various biological processes, including tumor initiation, propagation, and metastasis in glioblastoma as well as other cancers. Recent studies have shown the potential for oncogenic miRNAs as therapeutic targets in glioblastoma. However, the application of antisense oligomers, or anti-miRs, to the brain is limited due to the blood-brain barrier (BBB), when administered in the traditional systemic manner. To induce a therapeutic effect in glioblastoma, anti-miR therapy requires a robust and effective delivery system to overcome this obstacle. To bypass the BBB, different delivery administration methods for anti-miRs were evaluated. Stereotaxic surgery was performed to administer anti-Let-7 through intratumoral (ITu), intrathecal (ITh), and intraventricular (ICV) routes, and each method's efficacy was determined by changes in the expression of anti-Let-7 target genes as well as by immunohistochemical analysis. ITu administration of anti-miRs led to a high rate of anti-miR delivery to tumors in the brain by both bolus and continuous administration. In addition, ICV administration, compared with ITu administration, showed a greater distribution of the miR across entire brain tissues. This study suggests that local administration methods are a promising strategy for anti-miR treatment and may overcome current limitations in the treatment of glioblastoma in preclinical animal models.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntagomirsAntineoplastic AgentsBlood-Brain BarrierBrain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaHumansInjections, IntraventricularInjections, SpinalMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, NudeMicroRNAsXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntagomirsAntineoplastic AgentsMicroRNAsmirnlet7 microRNA, humananti-miRdelivery efficiencyglioblastomaintratumoral injectionintraventricular injection

Identifiers

PMID27102443
PMCPMC5045404
OpenAlexW2337239674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.