Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27102245›Full record

ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2016

Position statements on genetic test for peritoneal, ovarian, and fallopian tubal cancers: Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology (KSGO).

Min Chul Choi, Myong Cheol Lim, Dong Hoon Suh, Yong Jung Song, Tae Joong Kim, Suk Joon Chang, Jae Weon Kim, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. The Knowledge and Attitude of Patients Diagnosed with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer towards Genetic Testing.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Min Chul ChoiComprehensive Gynecologic Cancer Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4509-6731
Myong Cheol LimCenter for Uterine Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea. gynlim@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8964-7158
Dong Hoon SuhDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4312-966X
Yong Jung SongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6103-2466
Tae Joong KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9693-9164
Suk Joon ChangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0558-0038
Jae Weon KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1835-9436
Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingFallopian Tube NeoplasmsFemaleGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2HumansMutationOvarian NeoplasmsPeritoneal NeoplasmsRepublic of KoreaSocieties, Medical

Identifiers

PMID27102245
PMCPMC4864512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.