Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27102013›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2016

Cancer incidence in urban Shanghai, 1973-2010: an updated trend and age-period-cohort effects.

Ping-Ping Bao, Ying Zheng, Chun-Xiao Wu, Zhe-Zhou Huang, Yu-Tang Gao, Fan Jin, Yong-Bing Xiang, Wei-Jian Zhong, Wei Lu, Fan Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. [Analysis of the disease burden of Burkitt lymphoma in China from 1990 to 2021].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ping-Ping BaoDepartment of Cancer Control & Prevention, Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, 200336, People's Republic of China.
Ying ZhengDepartment of Cancer Control & Prevention, Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, 200336, People's Republic of China.
Chun-Xiao WuDepartment of Cancer Control & Prevention, Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, 200336, People's Republic of China.
Zhe-Zhou HuangDepartment of Cancer Control & Prevention, Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, 200336, People's Republic of China.
Yu-Tang GaoDepartment of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Fan JinDepartment of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Yong-Bing XiangDepartment of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Wei-Jian ZhongDepartment of Cancer Control & Prevention, Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, 200336, People's Republic of China.
Wei LuDepartment of Cancer Control & Prevention, Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, 200336, People's Republic of China. weiloo@msn.com.
Fan WuDepartment of Cancer Control & Prevention, Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, 200336, People's Republic of China. fanwu@scdc.sh.cn.
Shanghai Municipal Center For Disease Control Prevention · CNShanghai Cancer Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo provide a comprehensive overview of temporal trends in cancer incidence during 1973-2010 in urban Shanghai.

methodsThe estimated annual percent changes (EAPCs) for the whole period and for the time segments in age-standardized incidence rates (ASR) were evaluated with Joinpoint analysis. Age-period-cohort (APC) models were modeled to examine the effects of age, period and birth cohort on cancer incidence.

resultsThe overall ASR decreased slightly and significantly in males (EAPC of -0.41) but increased significantly in females (EAPC of 0.57) during 1973-2010 in urban Shanghai. The incidence trend was not linear and varied by time segments. During the most recent 10 years (2001-2010), the ASR in males decreased by 1.65% per year and stabilized in females. Incidence rates continued to decline during 1973-2010 for esophagus, stomach, and liver cancer in both sexes, as well as male lung cancer and cervix cancer. It should be noted that it was the first time to document a significant decline in lung cancer incidence among males during 1973-2010 with EAPC of -0.58%, and a notable upward for cervix cancer since 1996 with EAPC of 8.94%. Unfavorable trends in incidence were observed for the most common cancer sites in the 38 years period: colorectum, gallbladder & biliary tract, pancreas, kidney, bladder, brain & central nervous system (CNS), thyroid, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), prostate, female breast, corpus uteri, and ovary. APC analysis showed age, period and birth cohort yielded different effects by cancer sites.

conclusionsThe observed trends primarily reflect dramatic changes in socioeconomic development and lifestyles in urban Shanghai over the past four decades.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsChinaFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasmsUrban PopulationAge-period-cohort analysisCancer incidenceShanghaiTime trend

Identifiers

PMID27102013
PMCPMC4839149
OpenAlexW2339179914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.