Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27101868›Full record

ArticleActa neuropathologica communications2016

TP53 hotspot mutations are predictive of survival in primary central nervous system lymphoma patients treated with combination chemotherapy.

Helga D Munch-Petersen, Fazila Asmar, Konstantinos Dimopoulos, Aušrinė Areškevičiūtė, Peter Brown, Mia Seremet Girkov, Anja Pedersen, Lene D Sjö, Steffen Heegaard, Helle Broholm and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neuropathologica communications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Helga D Munch-PetersenDepartment of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Department 3733, Copenhagen Biocenter, Building 2, 3rd floor, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Fazila AsmarDepartment of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Department 3733, Copenhagen Biocenter, Building 2, 3rd floor, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Konstantinos DimopoulosDepartment of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Department 3733, Copenhagen Biocenter, Building 2, 3rd floor, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Aušrinė AreškevičiūtėDepartment of Pathology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Peter BrownDepartment of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Department 3733, Copenhagen Biocenter, Building 2, 3rd floor, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Mia Seremet GirkovDepartment of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Department 3733, Copenhagen Biocenter, Building 2, 3rd floor, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Anja PedersenDepartment of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Department 3733, Copenhagen Biocenter, Building 2, 3rd floor, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Lene D SjöDepartment of Pathology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Steffen HeegaardDepartment of Pathology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Helle BroholmDepartment of Pathology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lasse S KristensenDepartment of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Department 3733, Copenhagen Biocenter, Building 2, 3rd floor, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Elisabeth RalfkiaerDepartment of Pathology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kirsten GrønbækDepartment of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Department 3733, Copenhagen Biocenter, Building 2, 3rd floor, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark. kirsten.groenbaek@regionh.dk.
Rigshospitalet · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive variant of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) confined to the CNS. TP53 mutations (MUT-TP53) were investigated in the context of MIR34A/B/C- and DAPK promoter methylation status, and associated with clinical outcomes in PCNSL patients. In a total of 107 PCNSL patients clinical data were recorded, histopathology reassessed, and genetic and epigenetic aberrations of the p53-miR34-DAPK network studied. TP53 mutational status (exon 5-8), with structural classification of single nucleotide variations according to the IARC-TP53-Database, methylation status of MIR34A/B/C and DAPK, and p53-protein expression were assessed. The 57/107 (53.2 %) patients that were treated with combination chemotherapy +/- rituximab (CCT-treated) had a significantly better median overall survival (OS) (31.3 months) than patients treated with other regimens (high-dose methotrexate/whole brain radiation therapy, 6.0 months, or no therapy, 0.83 months), P < 0.0001. TP53 mutations were identified in 32/86 (37.2 %), among which 12 patients had hotspot/direct DNA contact mutations. CCT-treated patients with PCNSL harboring a hotspot/direct DNA contact MUT-TP53 (n = 9) had a significantly worse OS and progression free survival (PFS) compared to patients with non-hotspot/non-direct DNA contact MUT-TP53 or wild-type TP53 (median PFS 4.6 versus 18.2 or 45.7 months), P = 0.041 and P = 0.00076, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed that hotspot/direct DNA contact MUT-TP53 was predictive of poor outcome in CCT-treated PCNSL patients, P = 0.012 and P = 0.008; HR: 1.86 and 1.95, for OS and PFS, respectively. MIR34A, MIR34B/C, and DAPK promoter methylation were detected in 53/93 (57.0 %), 80/84 (95.2 %), and 70/75 (93.3 %) of the PCNSL patients with no influence on survival. Combined MUT-TP53 and MIR34A methylation was associated with poor PFS (median 6.4 versus 38.0 months), P = 0.0070. This study suggests that disruption of the p53-pathway by MUT-TP53in hotspot/direct DNA contact codons is predictive of outcome in CCT-treated PCNSL patients, and concomitant MUT-TP53 and MIR34A methylation are associated with poor PFS.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System NeoplasmsLymphomaPharmacogeneticsAnalysis of VarianceAntigens, CDAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDeath-Associated Protein KinasesDenmarkDNA MethylationDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMicroRNAsMutationPredictive Value of TestsAntigens, CDDAPK1 protein, humanDeath-Associated Protein KinasesMicroRNAsMIRN34 microRNA, humanTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53DNA methylationHotspot mutationsMIR34APCNSLSurvivalTP53

Identifiers

PMID27101868
PMCPMC4840983
OpenAlexW2339385299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.