Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27101821›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2016

Factors associated with adoption of beneficial newborn care practices in rural Eastern Uganda: a cross-sectional study.

Michael O Owor, Joseph K B Matovu, Daniel Murokora, Rhoda K Wanyenze, Peter Waiswa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Essential newborn care practice and its associated factors in Southwest Ethiopia.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael O OworMakerere University School of Public Health-CDC Fellowship Program, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda. owormichael@gmail.com.
Joseph K B MatovuMakerere University School of Public Health-CDC Fellowship Program, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Daniel MurokoraBaylor Uganda Children's Foundation, P.O. Box 72052, Kampala, Uganda.
Rhoda K WanyenzeMakerere University School of Public Health-CDC Fellowship Program, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Peter WaiswaMakerere University School of Public Health-CDC Fellowship Program, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBeneficial newborn care practices can improve newborn survival. However, little is known about the factors that affect adoption of these practices.

methodsCross-sectional study conducted among 1,616 mothers who had delivered in the past year in two health sub-districts (Luuka and Buyende) in Eastern Uganda. Data collection took place between November and December 2011. Data were collected on socio-demographic and economic characteristics, antenatal care visits, skilled delivery attendance, parity, distance to health facility and early newborn care knowledge and practices. Descriptive statistics were computed to determine the proportion of mothers who adopted beneficial newborn care practices (optimal thermal care; good feeding practices; weighing and immunizing the baby immediately after birth; and good cord care) during the neonatal period. We conducted multivariable logistic regression to assess the covariates of adoption of all beneficial newborn care practices. Analysis was done using STATA statistical software, version 12.1.

resultsOf the 1,616 mothers enrolled, 622 (38.5%) were aged 25-34; 1,472 (91.1%) were married; 1,096 (67.8%) had primary education; while 1,357 (84%) were laborers or peasants. Utilization of all beneficial newborn care practices was 11.7%; lower in Luuka (9.4%, n = 797) than in Buyende health sub-district (13.9%, n = 819; p = 0.005). Good cord care (83.6% in Luuka; 95% in Buyende) and immunization of newborn (80.7% in Luuka; 82.5% in Buyende) were the most prevalent newborn care practices reported by mothers. At the multivariable analysis, number of ANC visits (3-4 vs. 1-2: Adjusted (Adj.) Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.13, 2.52), skilled delivery (Adj. OR = 2.66, 95% CI = 1.92, 3.69), socio-economic status (middle vs. low: Adj. OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.09, 2.26) were positively associated with adoption of all beneficial newborn care practices among mothers.

conclusionAdoption of all beneficial newborn care practices was low, although associated with higher ANC visits; middle-level socio-economic status and skilled delivery attendance. These findings suggest a need for interventions to improve quality ANC and skilled delivery attendance as well as targeting of women with low and high socio-economic status with newborn care health educational messages, improved work conditions for breastfeeding, and supportive policies at national level for uptake of newborn care practices.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeRural PopulationAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansInfant CareInfant, NewbornMothersOdds RatioPregnancyPrenatal CareSocioeconomic FactorsUgandaBeneficial newborn care practicesMaternal characteristicsSocio-economic status

Identifiers

PMID27101821
PMCPMC4840909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.