Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27101776›Full record

ArticleInternational forum of allergy & rhinology2016

Non-diluted seawater enhances nasal ciliary beat frequency and wound repair speed compared to diluted seawater and normal saline.

Arnaud Bonnomet, Emilie Luczka, Christelle Coraux, Ludovic de Gabory

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International forum of allergy & rhinology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Saline irrigation for allergic rhinitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Seawater nasal wash to reduce symptom duration and viral load in COVID-19 and upper respiratory tract infections: a randomized controlled multicenter trial.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Trial
  3. Prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label study to compare efficacy of a mineral-rich solution vs normal saline after complete ethmoidectomy.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2019
    Trial
  4. Electrolyte-rich saline solutions significantly improve nasal epithelial repair, ciliary beating and epithelial inflammation vs. normal saline.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Efficacy of Normal Saline Nasal Spray Added to Standard Treatment Regimen of Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Randomised Controlled Trial.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arnaud BonnometNational Institute of Health and Medical Research (Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale [INSERM]) Scientific Mixed Research unit UMRS-S 903, Federative Structure Health Research Champagne-Ardennes-Picardie (SFR CAP-Santé): FED 4231, University of Reims-Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France.
Emilie LuczkaNational Institute of Health and Medical Research (Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale [INSERM]) Scientific Mixed Research unit UMRS-S 903, Federative Structure Health Research Champagne-Ardennes-Picardie (SFR CAP-Santé): FED 4231, University of Reims-Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France.
Christelle CorauxNational Institute of Health and Medical Research (Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale [INSERM]) Scientific Mixed Research unit UMRS-S 903, Federative Structure Health Research Champagne-Ardennes-Picardie (SFR CAP-Santé): FED 4231, University of Reims-Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France.
Ludovic de GaboryEar Nose and Throat (ENT) Department, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Hôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France. ludovic.de-gabory@chu-bordeaux.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe regulation of mucociliary clearance is a key part of the defense mechanisms developed by the airway epithelium. If a high aggregate quality of evidence shows the clinical effectiveness of nasal irrigation, there is a lack of studies showing the intrinsic role of the different irrigation solutions allowing such results. This study investigated the impact of solutions with different pH and ionic compositions, eg, normal saline, non-diluted seawater and diluted seawater, on nasal mucosa functional parameters.

methodsFor this randomized, controlled, blinded, in vitro study, we used airway epithelial cells obtained from 13 nasal polyps explants to measure ciliary beat frequency (CBF) and epithelial wound repair speed (WRS) in response to 3 isotonic nasal irrigation solutions: (1) normal saline 0.9%; (2) non-diluted seawater (Physiomer®); and (3) 30% diluted seawater (Stérimar). The results were compared to control (cell culture medium).

resultsNon-diluted seawater enhanced the CBF and the WRS when compared to diluted seawater and to normal saline. When compared to the control, it significantly enhanced CBF and slightly, though nonsignificantly, improved the WRS. Interestingly, normal saline markedly reduced the number of epithelial cells and ciliated cells when compared to the control condition.

conclusionOur results suggest that the physicochemical features of the nasal wash solution is important because it determines the optimal conditions to enhance CBF and epithelial WRS thus preserving the respiratory mucosa in pathological conditions. Non-diluted seawater obtains the best results on CBF and WRS vs normal saline showing a deleterious effect on epithelial cell function.

Indexed as

Nasal LavageSeawaterAdultAgedCells, CulturedCiliaEpithelial CellsFemaleHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMaleMiddle AgedNasal MucosaNasal PolypsSodium ChlorideWound HealingSodium Chlorideciliary beat frequencynasal mucosasalineseawaterwound repair

Identifiers

PMID27101776
PMCPMC5074274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.