Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27101388›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2016

Infant mortality in the United States.

J M Lorenz, C V Ananth, R A Polin, M E D'Alton

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. When external factors limit care options for complex fetal and neonatal diagnoses.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The effect of fertility treatment and socioeconomic status on neonatal and post-neonatal mortality in the United States.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The patient/physician relationship in a post-Roe world: a neonatologist viewpoint.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Physician-patient racial concordance and disparities in birthing mortality for newborns.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  18. Prematurity and race account for much of the interstate variation in infant mortality rates in the United States.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J M LorenzDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
C V AnanthDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
R A PolinDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
M E D'AltonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The infant mortality rate (IMR) of 6.0 per 1000 live births in the United States in 2013 is nearly the highest among developed countries. Moreover, the IMR among blacks is >twice that among whites-11.11 versus 5.06 deaths per 1000 live births.This higher IMR and racial disparity in IMR is due to a higher preterm birth rate (11.4% of live births in 2013) and higher IMR among term infants. The United States also ranks near the bottom for maternal mortality and life expectancy among the developed nations-despite ranking highest in the proportion of gross national product spent on health care. This suggests that factors other than health care contribute to the higher IMR and racial disparity in IMR. One factor is disadvantaged socioeconomic status. All of the actionable determinates that negatively impact health-personal behavior, social factors, heath-care access and quality and the environment-disproportionately affect the poor. Addressing disadvantaged socioeconomic status by improving access to quality health care and increasing social expenditures would have the greatest impact on the USA's IMR and racial disparity in IMR.

Indexed as

Infant MortalityBlack or African AmericanCause of DeathHealthcare DisparitiesHispanic or LatinoHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureLive BirthUnited StatesWhite People

Identifiers

PMID27101388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.