Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27101386›Full record

Observational studyJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2016

Stroke volume and cardiac output evaluation by electrical cardiometry: accuracy and reference nomograms in hemodynamically stable preterm neonates.

A Boet, G Jourdain, S Demontoux, D De Luca

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neonatal reference values and nomograms of systemic vascular resistances estimated with electrical cardiometry.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Article
  13. Transient tachypnoea: new concepts on the commonest neonatal respiratory disorder.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review
  14. Observational
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

A BoetCardiac ICU, "Marie Lannelongue" Surgical Center, South Paris University Hospitals, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1510-3347
G JourdainDivision of Paediatrics and Neonatal Critical Care, APHP, South Paris University Hospitals, "A. Beclere" Medical Center, Paris, France.
S DemontouxCardiac ICU, "Marie Lannelongue" Surgical Center, South Paris University Hospitals, Paris, France.
D De LucaDivision of Paediatrics and Neonatal Critical Care, APHP, South Paris University Hospitals, "A. Beclere" Medical Center, Paris, France.
Université Sorbonne Paris Nord · FRUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the accuracy of electrical cardiometry (EC) to measure stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO) and to provide gestational age (GA) and birth weight (BW)-based reference data for SV and CO in hemodynamically stable preterm neonates. STUDY

designProspective observational blinded study. Paired measurements of SV and CO on stable preterm infants without any hemodynamic compromise were carried out using EC (SVEC) and echocardiography (SVECHO).

resultsSeventy-nine preterm neonates (mean GA: 31±3.2 weeks) were enrolled. A good correlation was found for SV (r=0.743; P<0.0001) and CO (r=0.7; P<0.0001) measured by EC and echocardiography. These correlations remained significant after adjusting for GA, patent ductus arteriosus and type of respiratory support (SV: St.β=0.48, P<0.0001 and CO: St.β=0.69, P<0.0001). Mean biases (and variabilities) were -1.1 (from 0.7 to -2.9) ml and -0.21 (from 0.15 to -0.55) l min(-1) for SV and CO, respectively. Local regression shows a tendency for EC to overestimate SV and CO especially at higher values (at about >2 ml and >0.4 l min(-1), respectively). Coefficient of variation of SV was 48.9% and 52%, for EC and echocardiography. SV and CO rose with increasing GA and BW following an exponential equation (R(2)>0.8).

conclusionMeasuring SV and CO with EC in hemodynamically stable preterm infants shows good correlation and variability similar to that of echocardiography. A trend to overestimation exists at highest values, but it is unlikely to be clinically significant. Reference GA and BW-based nomograms for SV and CO are provided.

Indexed as

Stroke VolumeBirth WeightCardiography, ImpedanceDuctus Arteriosus, PatentEchocardiographyFemaleFranceGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureLinear ModelsMaleMonitoring, PhysiologicMultivariate AnalysisNomograms

Identifiers

PMID27101386
OpenAlexW2339928620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.