Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27101285›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Circulating Tumor Cell Composition in Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Ivonne Nel, Thomas C Gauler, Kira Bublitz, Lazaros Lazaridis, André Goergens, Bernd Giebel, Martin Schuler, Andreas-Claudius Hoffmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Liquid biopsy in modern medicine: advancing diagnostics from molecular insights to clinical practice.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Promising Biomarkers and the Challenges to Reach the Clinic.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ivonne NelMolecular Oncology Risk-Profile Evaluation, Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Thomas C GaulerMolecular Oncology Risk-Profile Evaluation, Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Kira BublitzMolecular Oncology Risk-Profile Evaluation, Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Lazaros LazaridisMolecular Oncology Risk-Profile Evaluation, Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
André GoergensInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Bernd GiebelInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Martin SchulerDepartment of Radiotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Andreas-Claudius HoffmannMolecular Oncology Risk-Profile Evaluation, Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
University of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDue to their minimal-invasive yet potentially current character circulating tumor cells (CTC) might be useful as a "liquid biopsy" in solid tumors. However, successful application in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has been very limited so far. High plasticity and heterogeneity of CTC morphology challenges currently available enrichment and detection techniques with EpCAM as the usual surface marker being underrepresented in mRCC. We recently described a method that enables us to identify and characterize non-hematopoietic cells in the peripheral blood stream with varying characteristics and define CTC subgroups that distinctly associate to clinical parameters. With this pilot study we wanted to scrutinize feasibility of this approach and its potential usage in clinical studies. EXPERIMENTAL

designPeripheral blood was drawn from 14 consecutive mRCC patients at the West German Cancer Center and CTC profiles were analyzed by Multi-Parameter Immunofluorescence Microscopy (MPIM). Additionally angiogenesis-related genes were measured by quantitative RT-PCR analysis.

resultsWe detected CTC with epithelial, mesenchymal, stem cell-like or mixed-cell characteristics at different time-points during anti-angiogenic therapy. The presence and quantity of N-cadherin-positive or CD133-positive CTC was associated with inferior PFS. There was an inverse correlation between high expression of HIF1A, VEGFA, VEGFR and FGFR and the presence of N-cadherin-positive and CD133-positive CTC.

conclusionsPatients with mRCC exhibit distinct CTC profiles that may implicate differences in therapeutic outcome. Prospective evaluation of phenotypic and genetic CTC profiling as prognostic and predictive biomarker in mRCC is warranted.

Indexed as

Neoplastic Cells, CirculatingAdultAgedCarcinoma, Renal CellFluorescent Antibody TechniqueGene Expression ProfilingHep G2 CellsHumansKidney NeoplasmsMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID27101285
PMCPMC4839694
OpenAlexW2338878558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.