Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27101207›Full record

ReviewAJR. American journal of roentgenology2016

Progress in Fully Automated Abdominal CT Interpretation.

Ronald M Summers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Application of deep learning assisted electronic laryngoscope in diagnosis of laryngeal leukoplakia].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Pilot study: Application of artificial intelligence for detecting left atrial enlargement on canine thoracic radiographs.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Advanced imaging techniques for chronic pancreatitis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ronald M Summers1 Imaging Biomarkers and Computer-aided Diagnosis Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bldg 10, Rm 1C224D, MSC 1182, Bethesda, MD 20892-1182.

Funding

Computer Aided Detection for CT ColonographyZ01CL040003 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI SUMMERS, RONALD M. · 2003 to 2008
$368k
Computer Aided Detection for Radiologic ImagesZ01CL040004 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI SUMMERS, RONALD M. · 2003 to 2008
$41k
Computer Aided Detection for CT ColonographyZIACL040003 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI SUMMERS, RONALD M. · 2009 to 2025
$0k
Computer Aided Detection for Radiologic ImagesZIACL040004 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI SUMMERS, RONALD M. · 2009 to 2025
$0k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 CL040003Intramural NIH HHS Z01 CL040004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAutomated analysis of abdominal CT has advanced markedly over just the last few years. Fully automated assessment of organs, lymph nodes, adipose tissue, muscle, bowel, spine, and tumors are some examples where tremendous progress has been made. Computer-aided detection of lesions has also improved dramatically.

conclusionThis article reviews the progress and provides insights into what is in store in the near future for automated analysis for abdominal CT, ultimately leading to fully automated interpretation.

Indexed as

Radiography, AbdominalTomography, X-Ray ComputedAutomationForecastingHumansRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assistedcomputer-aided detectionCTimage processingsegmentationvolumetrics

Identifiers

PMID27101207
PMCPMC4919161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.