Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27101006›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

3D Reconstruction of the Human Airway Mucosa In Vitro as an Experimental Model to Study NTHi Infections.

Pasquale Marrazzo, Silvia Maccari, Annarita Taddei, Luke Bevan, John Telford, Marco Soriani, Alfredo Pezzicoli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Interaction ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Through the Looking Glass:Applied in vitro toxicology · 2018
    Review
  16. Review
  17. UnravelingF1000Research · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pasquale MarrazzoGSK Vaccines S.r.l., via Fiorentina 1, 53100, Siena, Italy.
Silvia MaccariGSK Vaccines S.r.l., via Fiorentina 1, 53100, Siena, Italy.
Annarita TaddeiInterdepartmental Centre for Electron Microscopy, Tuscia University, Viterbo, Italy.
Luke BevanRespiratory Disease Area, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Horsham, RH12 5AB, United Kingdom.
John TelfordGSK Vaccines S.r.l., via Fiorentina 1, 53100, Siena, Italy.
Marco SorianiGSK Vaccines S.r.l., via Fiorentina 1, 53100, Siena, Italy.
Alfredo PezzicoliGSK Vaccines S.r.l., via Fiorentina 1, 53100, Siena, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have established an in vitro 3D system which recapitulates the human tracheo-bronchial mucosa comprehensive of the pseudostratified epithelium and the underlying stromal tissue. In particular, we reported that the mature model, entirely constituted of primary cells of human origin, develops key markers proper of the native tissue such as the mucociliary differentiation of the epithelial sheet and the formation of the basement membrane. The infection of the pseudo-tissue with a strain of NonTypeable Haemophilus influenzae results in bacteria association and crossing of the mucus layer leading to an apparent targeting of the stromal space where they release large amounts of vesicles and form macro-structures. In summary, we propose our in vitro model as a reliable and potentially customizable system to study mid/long term host-pathogen processes.

Indexed as

Models, AnatomicHaemophilus InfectionsHaemophilus influenzaeHumansIn Vitro TechniquesRespiratory Mucosa

Identifiers

PMID27101006
PMCPMC4839639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.