Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27100825›Full record

ArticleSubstance use & misuse2016

A Preliminary Investigation of Caffeinated Alcohol Use During Spring Break.

Ashley N Linden-Carmichael, Cathy Lau-Barraco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance use & misuse, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ashley N Linden-Carmichaela Department of Psychology , Old Dominion University , Norfolk , Virginia , USA.
Cathy Lau-Barracoa Department of Psychology , Old Dominion University , Norfolk , Virginia , USA.

Funding

The Examination of Caffeinated Alcohol Use in a Daily ContextF31AA023118 · NIAAA · OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY · PI LINDEN-CARMICHAEL, ASHLEY NICOLE · 2014 to 2015
$63k
NIAAA NIH HHS F31 AA023118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCaffeinated alcoholic beverages (e.g., Red Bull and vodka) are popular but associated with negative consequences. CABs may be particularly popular during Spring Break, a potentially risky social event.

objectivesWe aimed to identify the prevalence of Spring Break caffeinated alcohol use, determine how caffeinated alcohol use Spring Break drinking habits differ from usual, and examine the association between Spring Break caffeinated alcohol use and alcohol-related problems.

methodsData were collected from 95 college students during March of 2013 and 2014. Students completed questionnaires of their alcohol and caffeinated alcohol use before and during Spring Break and Spring Break alcohol-related problems.

resultsApproximately 54% of students used caffeinated alcohol during Spring Break. Spring Break caffeinated alcohol use was associated with more alcohol-related problems, even after controlling for other alcohol consumed and Spring Break vacation status. CONCLUSIONS/IMPORTANCE: Caffeinated alcoholic beverages are commonly consumed during Spring Break and their use uniquely predicted harms. Prevention efforts placed on caffeinated alcoholic beverage users may be helpful in reducing Spring Break-related harms.

Indexed as

Alcoholic BeveragesAlcohol Drinking in CollegeBeveragesEthanolHumansStudentsUniversitiesEthanolalcohol usecaffeinated alcoholcollege studentsnegative consequencesSpring Break

Identifiers

PMID27100825
PMCPMC4955283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.