Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27100747›Full record

ArticleTransfusion2016

Fibrinolytic shutdown: fascinating theory but randomized controlled trial data are needed.

Ian Roberts

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Transfusion, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Remote Damage Control Resuscitation in Austere Environments.Wilderness & environmental medicine · 2017
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ian RobertsClinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) to bleeding trauma patients who are within 3 hours of injury has been shown to safely reduce mortality in bleeding trauma patients. However, some believe that thromboelastography (TEG or ROTEM) can be used to subdivide these patients into those that will benefit from TXA and those that will be harmed by it. If thromboelastography can be used in this way there could be important patient benefits. However, if the approach is misguided, patients could be denied a lifesaving treatment. I believe that rather than debate the theoretical basis of this hypothesis, it should be tested by conducting a randomized controlled trial. Bleeding trauma patients who are within 3 hours of injury should be randomly allocated to receive TXA treatment or thromboelastometry-guided TXA treatment with the risk of death and complications compared between the groups. An adequately powered clinical trial would better serve patient interest than ongoing debate.

Indexed as

Antifibrinolytic AgentsHemorrhageHumansInjury Severity ScoreRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTranexamic AcidAntifibrinolytic AgentsTranexamic Acid

Identifiers

PMID27100747
OpenAlexW2396050801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.