Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27100459›Full record

ArticleSubstance use & misuse2016

Examining Risk for Frequent Cocaine Use: Focus on an African American Treatment Population.

Tamika Chere Barkley Zapolski, Patrick Baldwin, Carl W Lejuez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance use & misuse, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Systematic Review of Cocaine-Treatment Interventions for Black Americans.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A systematic scoping review of research on Black participants in the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tamika Chere Barkley Zapolskia Department of Psychology , Indiana University Purdue University-Indianapolis , Indianapolis , Indiana , USA.
Patrick Baldwina Department of Psychology , Indiana University Purdue University-Indianapolis , Indianapolis , Indiana , USA.
Carl W Lejuezb Department of Psychology , University of Maryland , College Park , Maryland , USA.

Funding

Vulnerability to Drug Use & HIV: Advancing Prevention for Rural African AmericansP30DA027827 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI BRODY, GENE H. · 2009 to 2018
$10.2M
Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteKL2TR001106 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI DENNE, SCOTT C., SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2013 to 2017
$3.2M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001106NIDA NIH HHS L40 DA038346NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA027827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCocaine use and its consequences are disproportionately higher and more severe among African Americans compared to other ethnic/racial groups.

objectivesThe aims of this study were to examine a risk model specific for African American users and assess whether risk varies as a function of sex.

methods270 African American adults in a residential drug treatment facility completed measurements assessing first and past year crack/cocaine use frequency, childhood trauma, and stress reactivity. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to examine the unique effect of each predictor variable on past year crack/cocaine frequency. Sex was included as a moderator variable in the regression analysis.

resultsAll predictor variables were positively correlated with past year crack/cocaine use. However, sex differences were also observed: females reported higher rates of childhood emotional abuse, childhood sexual abuse, and stress reactivity-as well as past year crack use and cocaine use-than males. Regression analyses were performed with sex, first year use, and stress reactivity emerging as the only significant predictors for frequency of crack and cocaine use among all study participants. Moreover, sex differences were observed in the influence of first year crack use frequency on past year crack use frequency, such that the effect was stronger for males than for females. Conclusion/Importance: This study offers a clearer understanding of the risk factors for crack and cocaine abuse specific to African Americans, as well as sex specific pathways to risk, providing useful implications for future prevention and treatment efforts.

Indexed as

Cocaine-Related DisordersBlack or African AmericanCrack CocaineFemaleHumansMaleRacial GroupsRegression AnalysisRisk FactorsUnited StatesCrack CocaineAfrican Americancocaine useracerisktreatment

Identifiers

PMID27100459
PMCPMC4961088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.