Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27100404›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Clinical Factors Associated with Lamina Cribrosa Thickness in Patients with Glaucoma, as Measured with Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography.

Kazuko Omodaka, Seri Takahashi, Akiko Matsumoto, Shigeto Maekawa, Tsutomu Kikawa, Noriko Himori, Hidetoshi Takahashi, Kazuichi Maruyama, Hiroshi Kunikata, Masahiro Akiba and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Changes in Optic Nerve Head Blood Flow During Horizontal Ocular Duction.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. What is glaucomatous optic neuropathy?Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2020
    Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kazuko OmodakaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Seri TakahashiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Akiko MatsumotoTopcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Shigeto MaekawaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Tsutomu KikawaTopcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Noriko HimoriDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Hidetoshi TakahashiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Kazuichi MaruyamaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Hiroshi KunikataDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Masahiro AkibaTopcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Toru NakazawaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the influence of various risk factors on thinning of the lamina cribrosa (LC), as measured with swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT; Topcon).

methodsThis retrospective study comprised 150 eyes of 150 patients: 22 normal subjects, 28 preperimetric glaucoma (PPG) patients, and 100 open-angle glaucoma patients. Average LC thickness was determined in a 3 x 3 mm cube scan of the optic disc, over which a 4 x 4 grid of 16 points was superimposed (interpoint distance: 175 μm), centered on the circular Bruch's membrane opening. The borders of the LC were defined as the visible limits of the LC pores. The correlation of LC thickness with Humphrey field analyzer-measured mean deviation (MD; SITA standard 24-2), circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (cpRNFLT), the vertical cup-to-disc (C/D) ratio, and tissue mean blur rate (MBR) was determined with Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. The relationship of LC thickness with age, axial length, intraocular pressure (IOP), MD, the vertical C/D ratio, central corneal thickness (CCT), and tissue MBR was determined with multiple regression analysis. Average LC thickness and the correlation between LC thickness and MD were compared in patients with the glaucomatous enlargement (GE) optic disc type and those with non-GE disc types, as classified with Nicolela's method.

resultsWe found that average LC thickness in the 16 grid points was significantly associated with overall LC thickness (r = 0.77, P < 0.001). The measurement time for this area was 12.4 ± 2.4 minutes. Average LC thickness in this area had a correlation coefficient of 0.57 with cpRNFLT (P < 0.001) and 0.46 (P < 0.001) with MD. Average LC thickness differed significantly between the groups (normal: 268 ± 23 μm, PPG: 248 ± 13 μm, OAG: 233 ± 20 μm). Multiple regression analysis showed that MD (β = 0.29, P = 0.013), vertical C/D ratio (β = -0.25, P = 0.020) and tissue MBR (β = 0.20, P = 0.034) were independent variables significantly affecting LC thickness, but age, axial length, IOP, and CCT were not. LC thickness was significantly lower in the GE patients (233.9 ± 17.3 μm) than the non-GE patients (243.6 ± 19.5 μm, P = 0.040). The correlation coefficient between MD and LC thickness was 0.58 (P < 0.001) in the GE patients and 0.39 (P = 0.013) in the non-GE patients.

conclusionCupping formation and tissue blood flow were independently correlated to LC thinning. Glaucoma patients with the GE disc type, who predominantly have large cupping, had lower LC thickness even with similar glaucoma severity.

Indexed as

AgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleGlaucomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedOptic DiskOptic Nerve DiseasesRetrospective StudiesTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID27100404
PMCPMC4839731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.