Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27100284›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2016

CEST-MRI detects metabolite levels altered by breast cancer cell aggressiveness and chemotherapy response.

Kannie W Y Chan, Lu Jiang, Menglin Cheng, Jannie P Wijnen, Guanshu Liu, Peng Huang, Peter C M van Zijl, Michael T McMahon, Kristine Glunde

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Inverting CEST orMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. MRI Detection of HepaticBiomedicines · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kannie W Y ChanRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of MR Research, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Lu JiangRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Cancer Imaging Research, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Menglin ChengRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Cancer Imaging Research, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jannie P WijnenRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Cancer Imaging Research, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Guanshu LiuRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of MR Research, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Peng HuangDepartment of Oncology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Division, School of Medicine and Department of Biostatistics, Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Peter C M van ZijlRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of MR Research, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Michael T McMahonRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of MR Research, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kristine GlundeRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Cancer Imaging Research, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

Theranostic Imaging of Metastatic Prostate CancerP50CA103175 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BARKER, PETER B · 2003 to 2015
$17.9M
Novel Approaches for CEST Labeling, Detection, Quantification and TranslationR01EB015032 · NIBIB · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI VAN ZIJL, PETER CM · 2011 to 2019
$3.9M
Multi-Color Exchange Transfer Imaging of Drug Delivery NanocarriersR01EB015031 · NIBIB · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI MCMAHON, MICHAEL T · 2011 to 2014
$2.4M
Multi-scale Molecular Imaging of the Degradome in Breast TumorsR01CA154725 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GLUNDE, KRISTINE · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
Imaging hypoxia-driven signaling pathways in the breast tumor microenvironmentR01CA134695 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GLUNDE, KRISTINE · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA103175NCI NIH HHS R01 CA134695NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154725NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB015031NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB015032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) is an MRI contrast mechanism that detects the exchange of protons from distinct hydroxyl, amine, and amide groups to tissue water through the transfer of signal loss, with repeated exchange enhancing their effective signal. We applied CEST to detect systematically 15 common cellular metabolites in a panel of differentially aggressive human breast cancer cell lines. The highest CEST contrast was generated by creatine, myo-inositol, glutamate, and glycerophosphocholine, whose cellular concentrations decreased with increasing breast cancer aggressiveness. These decreased metabolite concentrations resulted in turn in a decreased CEST profile with increasing breast cancer aggressiveness in water-soluble extracts of breast cell lines. Treatment of both breast cancer cell lines with the chemotherapy drug doxorubicin resulted in increased metabolic CEST profiles, which correlated with significant increases in creatine, phosphocreatine, and glycerophosphocholine. CEST can detect breast cancer aggressiveness and response to chemotherapy in water-soluble extracts of breast cell lines. The presented results help shed light on possible contributions from CEST-active metabolites to the CEST contrast produced by breast cancers. The metabolic CEST profile may improve detection sensitivity over conventional MRS, and may have the potential to assess breast cancer aggressiveness and response to chemotherapy non-invasively using MRI if specialized metabolic CEST profile detection can be realized in vivo. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisBiomarkers, TumorCell Line, TumorContrast MediaDose-Response Relationship, DrugDoxorubicinDrug MonitoringHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMCF-7 CellsMolecular ImagingNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasms, ExperimentalProton Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorContrast MediaDoxorubicinbreast cancercellsCESTchemotherapymetabolismmetabolites

Identifiers

PMID27100284
PMCPMC4873340
OpenAlexW2336563636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.