Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27100085›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2016

Improving Sprint Performance in Soccer: Effectiveness of Jump Squat and Olympic Push Press Exercises.

Irineu Loturco, Lucas Adriano Pereira, Ronaldo Kobal, Thiago Maldonado, Alessandro Fromer Piazzi, Altamiro Bottino, Katia Kitamura, Cesar Cavinato Cal Abad, Miguel de Arruda, Fabio Yuzo Nakamura

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Physiological Predictors of Competition Performance in CrossFit Athletes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  16. Relationships between the Expression of theJournal of human kinetics · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Irineu LoturcoNAR-Nucleus of High Performance in Sport, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Lucas Adriano PereiraNAR-Nucleus of High Performance in Sport, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Ronaldo KobalNAR-Nucleus of High Performance in Sport, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Thiago MaldonadoPalmeiras Sport Society, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Alessandro Fromer PiazziPalmeiras Sport Society, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Altamiro BottinoPalmeiras Sport Society, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Katia KitamuraNAR-Nucleus of High Performance in Sport, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Cesar Cavinato Cal AbadNAR-Nucleus of High Performance in Sport, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Miguel de ArrudaUniversity of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Fabio Yuzo NakamuraNAR-Nucleus of High Performance in Sport, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Training at the optimum power load (OPL) is an effective way to improve neuromuscular abilities of highly trained athletes. The purpose of this study was to test the effects of training using the jump squat (JS) or Olympic push-press (OPP) exercises at the OPL during a short-term preseason on speed-power related abilities in high-level under-20 soccer players. The players were divided into two training groups: JS group (JSG) and OPP group (OPPG). Both groups undertook 12 power-oriented sessions, using solely JS or OPP exercises. Pre- and post-6 weeks of training, athletes performed squat jump (SJ), countermovement jump (CMJ), sprinting speed (5, 10, 20 and 30 m), change of direction (COD) and speed tests. To calculate the transfer effect coefficient (TEC) between JS and MPP OPP and the speed in 5, 10, 20, and 30 m, the ratio between the result gain (effect size [ES]) in the untrained exercise and result gain in the trained exercise was calculated. Magnitude based inference and ES were used to test the meaningful effects. The TEC between JS and VEL 5, 10, 20, and 30 m ranged from 0.77 to 1.29, while the only TEC which could be calculated between OPP and VEL 5 was rather low (0.2). In addition, the training effects of JS on jumping and speed related abilities were superior (ES ranging from small to large) to those caused by OPP (trivial ES). To conclude, the JS exercise is superior to the OPP for improving speed-power abilities in elite young soccer players.

Indexed as

AdolescentAthletic PerformanceCompetitive BehaviorHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePlyometric ExerciseResistance TrainingRunningSoccer

Identifiers

PMID27100085
PMCPMC4839661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.