ArticleMalaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia2015
Prevalence of overactive bladder syndrome (OABS) among women with gynaecological problems and its risk factors in a tertiary hospital, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia: Implication for primary healthcare providers.
Article in Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence and Overactive Bladder Among Female University Students in Kazakhstan.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Validating 7-items Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) through Arabic linguistic version.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Screening: A double-edged sword.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this paper was to determine the prevalence of overactive bladder syndrome (OABS) and its risk factors among patients with other gynaecological problems.
methodsThis study was conducted on women aged more than 18 years who attended the gynaecology clinic for various diagnoses other than urinary problems at a tertiary hospital in Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia, for a period of 6 months. Data on patient's profile, symptoms and risk factors for overactive bladder (OAB) were prospectively collected using a structured questionnaire adapted from ICIQ (international consultation on incontinence questionnaire). Exclusion criteria included patients with confirmed diagnosis of stress incontinence or OAB, neurological impairment, gynaecological malignancy and those with a previous history of pelvic radiation. Chi-square test and logistic regression test were used in the statistical analysis. We presented the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval for each of the OAB symptoms with p-value of 0.05.
resultsThe prevalence of OAB among the patients (n = 573) in this study was 19.1%. History of giving births to macrosomic babies and presence of utero-vaginal prolapse (UVP) were shown to be significantly associated with OAB in the multivariate analysis. Other factors were advanced age, high parity and menopausal for more than 5 years. More than half of the patients with the symptoms of OAB did not seek treatment, as they did not think it is necessary.
conclusionIt is found that the prevalence of OAB is similar with many other studies conducted elsewhere. It was found to be multifactorial, but was highly significantly related with the presence of UVP, especially cystocoele and history of giving births to macrosomic babies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27099656PMC4826576W2469719385What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.