Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27099542›Full record

ReviewAdvances in medical education and practice2016

Effective colonoscopy training techniques: strategies to improve patient outcomes.

Ioannis S Papanikolaou, Pantelis S Karatzas, Lazaros T Varytimiadis, Athanasios Tsigaridas, Michail Galanopoulos, Nikos Viazis, Dimitrios G Karamanolis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in medical education and practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Screening colonoscopy: The present and the future.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ioannis S PapanikolaouHepato-gastroenterology Unit, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University General Hospital, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Pantelis S KaratzasGastroenterology Department, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Lazaros T VarytimiadisGastroenterology Department, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Athanasios TsigaridasGastroenterology Department, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Michail GalanopoulosGastroenterology Department, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Nikos ViazisGastroenterology Department, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Dimitrios G KaramanolisGastroenterology Department, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colonoscopy has substantially evolved during the last 20 years and many different training techniques have been developed in order to improve the performance of endoscopists. The most known are mechanical simulators, virtual reality simulators, computer-simulating endoscopy, magnetic endoscopic imaging, and composite and explanted animal organ simulators. Current literature generally indicates that the use of simulators improves performance of endoscopists and enhances safety of patients, especially during the initial phase of training. Moreover, newer endoscopes and imaging techniques such as high-definition colonoscopes, chromocolonoscopy with dyes spraying, and third-eye retroscope have been incorporated in everyday practice, offering better visualization of the colon and detection of polyps. Despite the abundance of these different technological features, training devices are not widely used and no official guideline or specified training algorithm or technique for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy has been evolved. In this review, we present the most important training methods currently available and evaluate these using existing literature. We also try to propose a training algorithm for novice endoscopists.

Indexed as

coloncolonoscopyendoscopistsendoscopypolypssimulatorteaching techniques

Identifiers

PMID27099542
PMCPMC4822804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.