Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27099480›Full record

Trial reportClinical interventions in aging2016

The effects of a multicomponent dyadic intervention on the mood, behavior, and physical health of people with dementia: a randomized controlled trial.

Anna-Eva Prick, Jacomine de Lange, Erik Scherder, Jos Twisk, Anne Margriet Pot

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical interventions in aging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04913818 (The Effects of the Buddy-Up Dyadic Physical Activity), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04913818 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Effects of the Buddy-Up Dyadic Physical Activity (BUDPA) Program on the Health Outcomes of Care Dyads of Dementia: A Pilot Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2021 to 2022Enrolled40ConditionsMild Dementia, Moderate DementiaArmsBUDPA Program, Control arm (Usual care)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Understanding leisure-time physical activity: Voices of people with MS who have moderate-to-severe disability and their family caregivers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna-Eva PrickDepartment of Clinical Psychology and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Faculty of Psychology and Education, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jacomine de LangeResearch Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Erik ScherderDepartment of Clinical Neuropsychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jos TwiskDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Anne Margriet PotDepartment of Clinical Psychology and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Faculty of Psychology and Education, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Program on Ageing, Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, the Netherlands; School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe effects of a multicomponent dyadic intervention on the mood, behavior, and physical health of people with dementia living in the community were evaluated in a randomized controlled trial. This multicomponent dyadic intervention is a translated and adapted version of an intervention that has been shown to be effective for people with dementia in the US. PATIENTS AND

methodsPeople with dementia living in the community and their family caregivers (N=111 caregiver-care recipient dyads) were randomly assigned to the intervention and comparison group. The intervention group received home-based physical exercise training, psycho-education, communication skills training, and pleasant activities training during 3 months directed at both the person with dementia and the caregiver. Mood, behavior, and physical health were measured at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. The effects of the study were determined by using generalized estimating equations based on an intention-to-treat analysis.

resultsAnalyses showed no beneficial effects over time on any of the outcome measures.

conclusionThis study showed no effects. The negative results in this study compared to the study that has been carried out in the US might be explained by the translation, adaptation, and shortening of the intervention used in the US, and a different social context. In addition, the results might be explained by the lack of room for improvement and by experiencing the intervention as too much of a burden. Furthermore, improving physical health might only be effective if the physical exercises are of moderate-to-high-intensity and are tailored in accordance with participants' preferences and needs. For future studies, because dyads often commented positively about the pleasure and support they received, it might also be valuable to measure quality of life outcomes such as relationship quality, pleasure, and self-esteem in dyadic focused interventions.

Indexed as

AffectAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaBehavior TherapyCaregiversDementiaExercise TherapyFemaleHome Care ServicesHumansLinear ModelsMaleMental HealthMiddle Agedcaregiversdementiainterventionmental healthprevention

Identifiers

PMID27099480
PMCPMC4820235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.