Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27099373›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental botany2016

Why small fluxes matter: the case and approaches for improving measurements of photosynthesis and (photo)respiration.

David T Hanson, Samantha S Stutz, John S Boyer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental botany, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Two-Source δPlant physiology · 2019
    Article
  6. Design and in vitro realization of carbon-conserving photorespiration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David T HansonDepartment of Biology, MSC03-2020, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA dthanson@unm.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0964-9335
Samantha S StutzDepartment of Biology, MSC03-2020, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.
John S BoyerInterdisciplinary Plant Group, 1-31 Agriculture Building, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.

Funding

UNM COBRE: THEORETICAL STUDY OF SPECIFICITY OF RNA SILENCING MECHANISMP20RR018754 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI LOKER, ERIC SAMUEL · 2003 to 2011
$16.7M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR018754
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its inception, the Farquhar et al. (1980) model of photosynthesis has been a mainstay for relating biochemistry to environmental conditions from chloroplast to global levels in terrestrial plants. Many variables could be assigned from basic enzyme kinetics, but the model also required measurements of maximum rates of photosynthetic electron transport (J max ), carbon assimilation (Vcmax ), conductance of CO2 into (g s ) and through (g m ) the leaf, and the rate of respiration during the day (R d ). This review focuses on improving the accuracy of these measurements, especially fluxes from photorespiratory CO2, CO2 in the transpiration stream, and through the leaf epidermis and cuticle. These fluxes, though small, affect the accuracy of all methods of estimating mesophyll conductance and several other photosynthetic parameters because they all require knowledge of CO2 concentrations in the intercellular spaces. This review highlights modified methods that may help to reduce some of the uncertainties. The approaches are increasingly important when leaves are stressed or when fluxes are inferred at scales larger than the leaf.

Indexed as

Carbon DioxideChloroplastsPhotosynthesisPlant LeavesPlant TranspirationCarbon DioxideDiffusioninternal leaf CO2mesophyll conductancephotosynthesisrespirationstomatal conductancexylem CO2.

Identifiers

PMID27099373
PMCPMC4867897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.