Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27099248›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of clinical nutrition2016

Nutritional Evaluation and Optimisation in Neonates: a randomized, double-blind controlled trial of amino acid regimen and intravenous lipid composition in preterm parenteral nutrition.

Sabita Uthaya, Xinxue Liu, Daphne Babalis, Caroline J Doré, Jane Warwick, Jimmy Bell, Louise Thomas, Deborah Ashby, Giuliana Durighel, Ash Ederies and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Lipid emulsions for parenterally fed term and late preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Lipid emulsions for parenterally fed preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. [Expert consensus on parenteral nutrition management in neonates (2025)].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Targeting optimal protein delivery in parenteral and enteral nutrition for preterm infants: a review of randomized, controlled trials.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Biochemical Parameters in Extremely Preterm Infants Receiving Mixed Lipid Emulsions.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sabita UthayaChelsea and Westminster National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Section of Neonatal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, s.uthaya@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6112-2277
Xinxue LiuImperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, and.
Daphne BabalisImperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, and Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom;
Caroline J DoréComprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom;
Jane WarwickWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom; and.
Jimmy BellInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Imperial College London and Medical Research Council Clinical Sciences Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Department of Life Sciences, University of Westminster, London, United Kingdom.
Louise ThomasInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Imperial College London and Medical Research Council Clinical Sciences Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Department of Life Sciences, University of Westminster, London, United Kingdom.
Deborah AshbyImperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, and.
Giuliana DurighelInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Imperial College London and Medical Research Council Clinical Sciences Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom;
Ash EderiesInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Imperial College London and Medical Research Council Clinical Sciences Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom;
Monica Yanez-LopezInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Imperial College London and Medical Research Council Clinical Sciences Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom;
Neena ModiChelsea and Westminster National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Section of Neonatal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London.
Hammersmith Hospital · GBNational Health Service · GBImperial College London · GBComprehensive Clinical Trials · USUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_G1002459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParenteral nutrition is central to the care of very immature infants. Current international recommendations favor higher amino acid intakes and fish oil-containing lipid emulsions.

objectiveThe aim of this trial was to compare 1) the effects of high [immediate recommended daily intake (Imm-RDI)] and low [incremental introduction of amino acids (Inc-AAs)] parenteral amino acid delivery within 24 h of birth on body composition and 2) the effect of a multicomponent lipid emulsion containing 30% soybean oil, 30% medium-chain triglycerides, 25% olive oil, and 15% fish oil (SMOF) with that of soybean oil (SO)-based lipid emulsion on intrahepatocellular lipid (IHCL) content.

designWe conducted a 2-by-2 factorial, double-blind, multicenter randomized controlled trial.

resultsWe randomly assigned 168 infants born at <31 wk of gestation. We evaluated outcomes at term in 133 infants. There were no significant differences between Imm-RDI and Inc-AA groups for nonadipose mass [adjusted mean difference: 1.0 g (95% CI: -108, 111 g; P = 0.98)] or between SMOF and SO groups for IHCL [adjusted mean SMOF:SO ratio: 1.1 (95% CI: 0.8, 1.6; P = 0.58]. SMOF does not affect IHCL content. There was a significant interaction (P = 0.05) between the 2 interventions for nonadipose mass. There were no significant interactions between group differences for either primary outcome measure after adjusting for additional confounders. Imm-RDI infants were more likely than Inc-AA infants to have blood urea nitrogen concentrations >7 mmol/L or >10 mmol/L, respectively (75% compared with 49%, P < 0.01; 49% compared with 18%, P < 0.01). Head circumference at term was smaller in the Imm-RDI group [mean difference: -0.8 cm (95% CI: -1.5, -0.1 cm; P = 0.02)]. There were no significant differences in any prespecified secondary outcomes, including adiposity, liver function tests, incidence of conjugated hyperbilirubinemia, weight, length, mortality, and brain volumes.

conclusionImm-RDI of parenteral amino acids does not benefit body composition or growth to term and may be harmful. This trial was registered at www.isrctn.com as ISRCTN29665319 and at eudract.ema.europa.eu as EudraCT 2009-016731-34.

Indexed as

AdiposityAmino AcidsBody CompositionDouble-Blind MethodFat Emulsions, IntravenousFish OilsGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureOlive OilParenteral NutritionSoybean OilTreatment OutcomeTriglyceridesAmino AcidsFat Emulsions, IntravenousFish OilsOlive OilSoybean OilTriglyceridesamino acidbody compositionintrahepatocellular lipidlipid emulsionparenteral nutritionpreterm infantrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID27099248
PMCPMC4880995
OpenAlexW2336095286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.