Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27099226›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2016

Neuropsychological Assessment Following Concussion: an Evidence-Based Review of the Role of Neuropsychological Assessment Pre- and Post-Concussion.

Anthony P Kontos, Alicia Sufrinko, Melissa Womble, Nathan Kegel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anthony P KontosUPMC Sports Medicine Concussion Program/Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, 3200 South Water St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA. akontos@pitt.edu.
Alicia SufrinkoUPMC Sports Medicine Concussion Program/Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, 3200 South Water St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA.
Melissa WombleUPMC Sports Medicine Concussion Program/Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, 3200 South Water St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA.
Nathan KegelUPMC Sports Medicine Concussion Program/Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, 3200 South Water St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuropsychological evaluation is one component of a comprehensive and multifaceted assessment following concussion. Although some neuropsychologists use a "hybrid" assessment approach integrating computerized neurocognitive testing batteries with traditional paper and pencil tests, computerized neurocognitive test batteries are the predominant testing modality for assessment of athletes from the youth to professional level. This review summarizes the most recent research supporting the utility of neuropsychological evaluation and highlights the strengths and weaknesses of both computerized and traditional neuropsychological testing approaches. The most up to date research and guidelines on baseline neurocognitive testing is also discussed. This paper addresses concerns regarding reliability of neuropsychological testing while providing an overview of factors that influence test performance, both transient situational factors (e.g., pain level, anxiety) and characteristics of particular subgroups (e.g., age, preexisting learning disabilities), warranting the expertise of an experienced neuropsychologist for interpretation. Currently, research is moving forward by integrating neuropsychological evaluation with emerging assessment approaches for other domains of brain function (e.g., vestibular function) vulnerable to concussion.

Indexed as

Neuropsychological TestsBrain ConcussionCognition DisordersEvidence-Based PracticeHumansReproducibility of ResultsBaselineComputerized assessment batteryConcussionNeurocognitive testsNeuropsychological evaluationSport

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.