Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27098822›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2016

Multicentre open-label randomised controlled trial to compare colistin alone with colistin plus meropenem for the treatment of severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections (AIDA): a study protocol.

Yaakov Dickstein, Leonard Leibovici, Dafna Yahav, Noa Eliakim-Raz, George L Daikos, Anna Skiada, Anastasia Antoniadou, Yehuda Carmeli, Amir Nutman, Inbar Levi and 15 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01732250 (Multicenter Open-label RCT to Compare Colistin Alone vs. Colistin Plus Meropenem), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01732250 phase4completednot on this map

Multicenter Open-label RCT to Compare Colistin Alone vs. Colistin Plus Meropenem

TypeinterventionalSponsorMical PaulRan2013 to 2017Enrolled406ConditionsGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsArmsColistin, Meropenem
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antibiotics for hospital-acquired pneumonia in neonates and children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Eravacycline: From broad-spectrum coverage to novel clinical applications.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Evidence-Based Treatment ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Quantifying the effect of in-hospital antimicrobial use on the development of colistin-resistantEuropean journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Polymyxin Resistance in Gram-negative Pathogens.Current infectious disease reports · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 11 institutions in 5 countries.

Yaakov DicksteinDivision of Infectious Diseases, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Leonard LeiboviciDepartment of Medicine E, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv, Israel.
Dafna YahavSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv, Israel Unit of Infectious Diseases, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Noa Eliakim-RazSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv, Israel Unit of Infectious Diseases, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel.
George L DaikosFirst Department of Medicine, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Anna SkiadaFirst Department of Medicine, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Anastasia AntoniadouFourth Department of Medicine, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Yehuda CarmeliDivision of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Centre, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Amir NutmanSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv, Israel Division of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Centre, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Inbar LeviDivision of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Centre, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Amos AdlerMicrobiology Laboratory, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Centre, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Emanuele Durante-MangoniInternal Medicine, Second University of Naples, Monaldi Hospital-AORN dei Colli, Napoli, Italy.
Roberto AndiniInternal Medicine, Second University of Naples, Monaldi Hospital-AORN dei Colli, Napoli, Italy.
Giusi CavezzaInternal Medicine, Second University of Naples, Monaldi Hospital-AORN dei Colli, Napoli, Italy.
Johan W MoutonDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Rixt A WijmaDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ursula TheuretzbacherCenter for Anti-Infective Agents, Vienna, Austria.
Lena E FribergDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anders N KristofferssonDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Oren ZusmanDepartment of Medicine E, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv, Israel.
Fidi KoppelDivision of Infectious Diseases, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Yael Dishon BenattarDivision of Infectious Diseases, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Sergey AltuninFaculty of Medicine, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Mical PaulDivision of Infectious Diseases, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
AIDA consortium
Tel Aviv University · ILNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRRambam Health Care Campus · ILTel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center · ILTechnion – Israel Institute of Technology · ILUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUppsala University · SEErasmus MC · NLOspedale Monaldi · ITRabin Medical Center · ILRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria has driven renewed interest in older antibacterials, including colistin. Previous studies have shown that colistin is less effective and more toxic than modern antibiotics. In vitro synergy studies and clinical observational studies suggest a benefit of combining colistin with a carbapenem. A randomised controlled study is necessary for clarification. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, investigator-initiated, open-label, randomised controlled superiority 1:1 study comparing colistin monotherapy with colistin-meropenem combination therapy for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. The study is being conducted in 6 centres in 3 countries (Italy, Greece and Israel). We include patients with hospital-associated and ventilator-associated pneumonia, bloodstream infections and urosepsis. The primary outcome is treatment success at day 14, defined as survival, haemodynamic stability, stable or improved respiratory status for patients with pneumonia, microbiological cure for patients with bacteraemia and stability or improvement of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. Secondary outcomes include 14-day and 28-day mortality as well as other clinical end points and safety outcomes. A sample size of 360 patients was calculated on the basis of an absolute improvement in clinical success of 15% with combination therapy. Outcomes will be assessed by intention to treat. Serum colistin samples are obtained from all patients to obtain population pharmacokinetic models. Microbiological sampling includes weekly surveillance samples with analysis of resistance mechanisms and synergy. An observational trial is evaluating patients who met eligibility requirements but were not randomised in order to assess generalisability of findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by ethics committees at each centre and informed consent will be obtained for all patients. The trial is being performed under the auspices of an independent data and safety monitoring committee and is included in a broad dissemination strategy regarding revival of old antibiotics. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01732250 and 2012-004819-31; Pre-results.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaColistinDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialFemaleGram-Negative BacteriaGreeceHumansIsraelItalyMaleMeropenemAnti-Bacterial AgentsColistinMeropenemThienamycinscarbapenem-resistant Gram negative bacteriacolistincombination therapymeropenem

Identifiers

PMID27098822
PMCPMC4838684
OpenAlexW2338766230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.