ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016
Ligand Specificity and Evolution of Mammalian Musk Odor Receptors: Effect of Single Receptor Deletion on Odor Detection.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- An odorant receptor for a key odor constituent of ambergris.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Recalibrating Olfactory Neuroscience to the Range of Naturally Occurring Odor Concentrations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Review
- Conserved pattern-based classification of human odorant receptor multigene family.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- The influence of olfactory experience on the birthrates of olfactory sensory neurons with specific odorant receptor identities.Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) · 2024Review
- AAV-delivered muscone-induced transgene system for treating chronic diseases in mice via inhalation.Nature communications · 2024Article
- M2OR: a database of olfactory receptor-odorant pairs for understanding the molecular mechanisms of olfaction.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Genetic variation in the human olfactory receptor OR5AN1 associates with the perception of musks.Chemical senses · 2023Article
- Article
- Synthesis of Cyclic Fragrances via Transformations of Alkenes, Alkynes and Enynes: Strategies and Recent Progress.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Large-Scale G Protein-Coupled Olfactory Receptor-Ligand Pairing.ACS central science · 2022Article
- From musk to body odor: Decoding olfaction through genetic variation.PLoS genetics · 2022Article
- Functional analysis of human olfactory receptors with a high basal activity using LNCaP cell line.PloS one · 2022Article
- The behavioral sensitivity of mice to acetate esters.Chemical senses · 2022Article
- Machine Learning Assisted Approach for Finding Novel High Activity Agonists of Human Ectopic Olfactory Receptors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Ectopic Odorant Receptor Responding to Flavor Compounds: Versatile Roles in Health and Disease.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- Deconstructing the mouse olfactory percept through an ethological atlas.Current biology : CB · 2021Article
- Conserved C-terminal motifs in odorant receptors instruct their cell surface expression and cAMP signaling.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2021Article
- Odor coding in the mammalian olfactory epithelium.Cell and tissue research · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Musk odors have been used widely for fragrance and medicine for >2000 years because of their fascinating scent and physiological effects. Therefore, fragrance manufacturers have been eager to develop high-quality musk compounds that are safe and easily synthesized. We recently identified muscone-responsive olfactory receptors (ORs) MOR215-1 and OR5AN1 in mice and humans, respectively (Shirasu et al., 2014). In this study, we identified musk ORs that are evolutionarily closely related to MOR215-1 or OR5AN1 in various primates and investigated structure-activity relationships for various musk odorants and related compounds. We found that each species has one or two functional musk ORs that exhibit specific ligand spectra to musk compounds. Some of them, including the human OR5AN1, responded to nitro musks with chemical properties distinct from muscone. The ligand specificity of OR5AN1 reflects the perception of musk odors in humans. Genetic deletion of MOR215-1 in mice resulted in drastic reduction of sensitivity to muscone, suggesting that MOR215-1 plays a critical role in muscone perception. Therefore, the current study reveals a clear link between the identified OR and muscone perception. Moreover, the strategy established for screening ligands for the muscone OR may facilitate the development of novel and commercially useful musk odors. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The long-sought musk odor receptor family in mammals was discovered and found to be well conserved and narrowly tuned to musk odors. In mice, deletion of the most sensitive musk receptor resulted in drastic reduction in sensitivity to muscone, demonstrating a strong link between receptor and odor perception. In humans, we found one musk receptor that recognized both macrocyclic and nitro musks that had distinct chemical structures. The structure-activity relationships were in a good agreement with human sensory perception and therefore may be used to develop novel musk aroma in fragrance fields. Finally, identification of a natural ligand(s) for musk receptors in mammals other than musk deer would reveal an evolutionarily pivotal role in each species in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.