Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27098690›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016

Mice Can Use Second-Order, Contrast-Modulated Stimuli to Guide Visual Perception.

Zeinab Khastkhodaei, Ovidiu Jurjut, Steffen Katzner, Laura Busse

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ecological Visual Processing in the Mouse.Annual review of neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Having More Choices Changes How Human Observers Weight Stable Sensory Evidence.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zeinab KhastkhodaeiWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany, Neuroscience Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, and Division of Neurobiology, Department Biology II, LMU Munich, Munich 82151, Germany.
Ovidiu JurjutWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany.
Steffen KatznerWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany.
Laura BusseWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany, Division of Neurobiology, Department Biology II, LMU Munich, Munich 82151, Germany busse@bio.lmu.de.
University of Tübingen · DELMU Klinikum · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual processing along the primate ventral stream takes place in a hierarchy of areas, characterized by an increase in both complexity of neuronal preferences and invariance to changes of low-level stimulus attributes. A basic type of invariance is form-cue invariance, where neurons have similar preferences in response to first-order stimuli, defined by changes in luminance, and global features of second-order stimuli, defined by changes in texture or contrast. Whether in mice, a now popular model system for early visual processing, visual perception can be guided by second-order stimuli is currently unknown. Here, we probed mouse visual perception and neural responses in areas V1 and LM using various types of second-order, contrast-modulated gratings with static noise carriers. These gratings differ in their spatial frequency composition and thus in their ability to invoke first-order mechanisms exploiting local luminance features. We show that mice can transfer learning of a coarse orientation discrimination task involving first-order, luminance-modulated gratings to the contrast-modulated gratings, albeit with markedly reduced discrimination performance. Consistent with these behavioral results, we demonstrate that neurons in area V1 and LM are less responsive and less selective to contrast-modulated than to luminance-modulated gratings, but respond with broadly similar preferred orientations. We conclude that mice can, at least in a rudimentary form, use second-order stimuli to guide visual perception. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: To extract object boundaries in natural scenes, the primate visual system does not only rely on differences in local luminance but can also take into account differences in texture or contrast. Whether the mouse, which has a much simpler visual system, can use such second-order information to guide visual perception is unknown. Here we tested mouse perception of second-order, contrast-defined stimuli and measured their neural representations in two areas of visual cortex. We find that mice can use contrast-defined stimuli to guide visual perception, although behavioral performance and neural representations were less robust than for luminance-defined stimuli. These findings shed light on basic steps of feature extraction along the mouse visual cortical hierarchy, which may ultimately lead to object recognition.

Indexed as

AnimalsContrast SensitivityFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOrientationPhotic StimulationVisual CortexVisual Perceptionclassical conditioningcue-invarianceLMorientation discriminationorientation tuningV1

Identifiers

PMID27098690
PMCPMC6601823
OpenAlexW2337718925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.