Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27098676›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2016

The Lung Screen Uptake Trial (LSUT): protocol for a randomised controlled demonstration lung cancer screening pilot testing a targeted invitation strategy for high risk and 'hard-to-reach' patients.

Samantha L Quaife, Mamta Ruparel, Rebecca J Beeken, Andy McEwen, John Isitt, Gary Nolan, Karen Sennett, David R Baldwin, Stephen W Duffy, Samuel M Janes and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02558101 (Randomised Controlled Trial to Test Novel Invitation Methods and Materials Targeted to Increase Informed Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening in Individuals at High Risk of Lung Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02558101 nacompletednot on this map

Randomised Controlled Trial to Test Novel Invitation Methods and Materials Targeted to Increase Informed Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening in Individuals at High Risk of Lung Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity College, LondonRan2015 to 2022Enrolled1,997ConditionsLung CancerArmsControl invitation materials, Intervention invitation materials
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Samantha L QuaifeHealth Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. samantha.quaife@ucl.ac.uk.
Mamta RuparelLungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, Division of Medicine, Rayne Building, University College London, 5 University Street, London, WC1E 6JF, UK.
Rebecca J BeekenHealth Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Andy McEwenHealth Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
John IsittResonant Media, 55 Old Compton Street, London, W1D 6HW, UK.
Gary NolanResonant Media, 55 Old Compton Street, London, W1D 6HW, UK.
Karen SennettKillick Street Health Centre, 75 Killick Street, London, N1 9RH, UK.
David R BaldwinRespiratory Medicine Unit, David Evans Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals, City Campus, Nottingham, NG5 1 PB, UK.
Stephen W DuffyWolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK.
Samuel M JanesLungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, Division of Medicine, Rayne Building, University College London, 5 University Street, London, WC1E 6JF, UK.
Jane WardleHealth Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 17976Department of HealthMedical Research CouncilWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParticipation in low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screening offered in the trial context has been poor, especially among smokers from socioeconomically deprived backgrounds; a group for whom the risk-benefit ratio is improved due to their high risk of lung cancer. Attracting high risk participants is essential to the success and equity of any future screening programme. This study will investigate whether the observed low and biased uptake of screening can be improved using a targeted invitation strategy. METHODS/

designA randomised controlled trial design will be used to test whether targeted invitation materials are effective at improving engagement with an offer of lung cancer screening for high risk candidates. Two thousand patients aged 60-75 and recorded as a smoker within the last five years by their GP, will be identified from primary care records and individually randomised to receive either intervention invitation materials (which take a targeted, stepped and low burden approach to information provision prior to the appointment) or control invitation materials. The primary outcome is uptake of a nurse-led 'lung health check' hospital appointment, during which patients will be offered a spirometry test, an exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) reading, and an LDCT if eligible. Initial data on demographics (i.e. age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation score) and smoking status will be collected in primary care and analysed to explore differences between attenders and non-attenders with respect to invitation group. Those who attend the lung health check will have further data on smoking collected during their appointment (including pack-year history, nicotine dependence and confidence to quit). Secondary outcomes will include willingness to be screened, uptake of LDCT and measures of informed decision-making to ensure the latter is not compromised by either invitation strategy. DISCUSSION: If effective at improving informed uptake of screening and reducing bias in participation, this invitation strategy could be adopted by local screening pilots or a national programme.

trial registrationThis study was registered with the ISRCTN (International Standard Registered Clinical/soCial sTudy Number: ISRCTN21774741) on the 23rd September 2015 and the NIH ClinicalTrials.gov database (NCT0255810) on the 22nd September 2015.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerAgedCarbon MonoxideFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareSmokingCarbon MonoxideCancer screeningHealth inequalitiesLung cancerSmoking

Identifiers

PMID27098676
PMCPMC4839109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.